EB-1A Denied? Why a Judge Just Called USCIS's Strategy Illegal скачать в хорошем качестве

EB-1A Denied? Why a Judge Just Called USCIS's Strategy Illegal

If USCIS denied your Green Card saying you met the criteria but failed the "Final Merits," that decision might have been unlawful. For years, uscis has used a subjective "two-step" test (known as Kazarian) to deny engineers who are otherwise qualified for the eb1a visa . But in a groundbreaking ruling, a Federal District Court has declared that this "Final Merits Determination" was never properly adopted as law. In this video, we analyze the Amin v. Mayorkas decision and explain why the court found the government's favorite denial strategy to be illegal—and what this means for your petition. 📺 Video Breakdown: 0:00 - The "Final Merits" Trap explained 0:55 - Why meeting 3 of 10 criteria isn't enough for uscis 1:40 - The Amin v. Mayorkas Ruling: A blow to the government 2:30 - "Procedural Error": How they broke the law by adding Step 2 3:15 - Why the judge ordered an APPROVAL (not just a remand) 4:10 - Can you use this case law outside of Nebraska? 💡 Key Takeaways for Engineers: The Issue: USCIS often admits an engineer meets the regulatory criteria but denies the case based on a vague "totality of the evidence" assessment. The Ruling: The court ruled that the "Final Merits" step is a substantive rule that required public notice and comment—which never happened. The Strategy: While not binding nationwide yet, this logic attacks the very foundation of most eb1a denials. 🔗 Connect With The Alagiri Immigration Law Firm We help Engineers Get EB-1A Visa Green Cards! 👉 Website: https://alagirilaw.com/ 👉 Disclaimer: https://alagirilaw.com/attorney-adver... #USImmigration #TrumpVisaBan #GreenCard #H1B #ImmigrationLawyer