У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Public Debate: "UMW Should be an AI University" или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The February 4, 2026, public debate on the resolution: “Resolved: UMW Should be an AI university.” The moderator (Tim O'Donnell) frames debate as the right method for high-stakes institutional decisions, then the affirmative (Anand Rao) argues for rapid AI integration (workforce, ethics, infrastructure), while the negative (Stefan Bauschard) argues universities should center human flourishing, deliberative process, and enduring purpose—not rebrand around a tool. Audience Q&A presses on branding, evidence, creativity, job displacement, and what responsible adoption should look like, followed by rebuttals and a final vote. The debate was sponsored by UMW's Center for AI and the Liberal Arts https://academics.umw.edu/center-for-ai/ 0:00 Welcome + why the provost is moderating 1:06 Why debate matters for “important discussions” 2:49 Debate format + rules of engagement 3:38 Introducing the debaters + “40 years in the making” backstory 6:48 Affirmative opening: why UMW should be an AI university 8:41 Argument 1: workforce imperative + labor-market claims 10:17 Argument 2: liberal arts as AI’s essential partner (ethics/humanities) 12:36 Argument 3: UMW’s momentum + Kodak “creative destruction” analogy 15:03 Negative opening: pro-AI, anti-“AI university” framing 16:44 Argument 1: universities are for human flourishing, not tool-centered identity 18:37 Argument 2: process matters—deliberative legitimacy and buy-in 19:47 Argument 3: tools change, purpose endures (internet/electricity analogy) 21:28 Cross-ex: naming, focus, and whether “AI university” shifts institutional priorities 33:08 Audience Q&A: branding risks, liberal arts identity, and differentiation 39:26 Audience Q&A: University of Florida—evidence of student benefit? 43:32 Audience Q&A: creativity, AI art, and drawing the line 51:57 Audience Q&A: moral case—job displacement and “end-times” concerns 58:51 Rebuttals begin: “nostalgia is not a strategy” vs. “V.U.C.A. world” framing 1:11:08 Post-debate survey + closing remarks + final vote result #UMWCenterforAIandtheLiberalArts#UMW #HigherEd #ArtificialIntelligence #AIinEducation #AIUniversity #LiberalArts #HumanFlourishing #Debate #DeliberativeDemocracy #AIEthics #FutureOfWork #AIForGood #CriticalThinking #Rhetoric #DigitalStudies #HigherEducationLeadership #CampusDialogue #AcademicInnovation #StudentVoice #AIxHigherEd