Is Candace Owens Right About Charlie Kirk's Assassination? Forensic Expert Analysis скачать в хорошем качестве

Is Candace Owens Right About Charlie Kirk's Assassination? Forensic Expert Analysis

Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @drgexplains   Dr. G's Body Language Course: https://www.drgexplains.com/offers/CE... In this video, Dr. G — clinical and forensic psychologist and body language expert — examines the controversial claims Candace Owens has made surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Owens has argued that leaked text messages show Kirk breaking with the “pro-Israel cause” after a $2 million Jewish donor threatened to withdraw support unless he canceled Tucker Carlson. She has also suggested that Kirk predicted his own death, and accused Turning Point USA executives of complicity by failing to pursue alternative theories about what happened. These statements have fueled speculation about foreign involvement, internal cover-ups, and hidden motives. Dr. G analyzes these allegations against the available forensic evidence, including the FBI’s case against Tyler Robinson. Owens has questioned whether Robinson could have carried out the assassination as described, pointing to perceived inconsistencies and suggesting that the official story is too “neat.” She has also referenced Lance Twiggs in her commentary, raising questions about connections and possible roles in the broader narrative. By weighing these claims, this video explores whether the supposed anomalies hold up under scrutiny. Candace Owens has alleged that in the 48 hours before his death, Charlie Kirk sent leaked texts indicating he was under pressure from Jewish donors, including one who purportedly pulled a $2 million annual donation after he refused to “cancel Tucker Carlson,” and that Kirk was considering stepping back from the “pro-Israel cause.” She claims that high-profile figures — including Bill Ackman and Israeli interests — orchestrated a coercive “intervention” to force Kirk’s allegiance on Israel, framing it as blackmail. Owens further suggests that Kirk predicted his own death, asserting that he told confidants “they’re going to kill me” just before the assassination. She also accuses TPUSA leadership of complicity or cover-up by failing to seriously pursue alternate theories, arguing that silence or deference to the official narrative amounts to suppression. Finally, Owens contends that the assassination of Kirk is part of a larger geopolitical scheme tied to Israel’s influence, rather than a lone actor incident. Through a forensic lens, Dr. G highlights how donor disputes, organizational silence, and conspiracy speculation differ from demonstrable proof. By comparing this case to other criminal prosecutions where digital communications and forensic trails played a decisive role, the analysis shows that many elements of the Robinson investigation are consistent with established patterns rather than evidence of a cover-up. This video offers a structured approach for separating plausible questions from extraordinary claims, helping viewers understand what is supported, what is speculative, and what still remains unclear in this highly charged case. #charliekirk #candaceowens #tpusa ------------------------ Visit my website: www.drgexplains.com ------------------------ Dr. G is a clinical and forensic psychologist. He is a published author, entrepreneur, and currently conducts psychotherapy, and couples’ therapy. Disclaimer THIS IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT The information offered herein does not constitute a substitute for professional psychological treatment, therapy, or other types of professional advice and intervention. Dr. Garrison does not assume any responsibility for errors, omissions or contrary interpretations of the subject matter herein. The informational contents are solely the opinion of Dr. Garrison and should not be considered as a form of therapy, advice, direction and/or diagnosis or treatment of any kind: medical, spiritual, mental, or other. Instead, the information is provided as entertainment. If expert advice or counseling is needed, the services of a competent professional should be sought.