Priscilla's Invitation: Jesus's Identity Part 2, Josephus's Testimonium Flavianum скачать в хорошем качестве

Priscilla's Invitation: Jesus's Identity Part 2, Josephus's Testimonium Flavianum

Part 1 Is Jesus a Myth?    • Priscilla's Invitation: Jesus's Identity P...   Quoted Sources (matching numbers in video) 1 T. C. Schmidt, Josephus and Jesus: New Evidence for the One Called Christ (Oxford University Press, 2025), 3, n.11. 2 Mark Strauss, Four Portraits, One Jesus: A Survey of Jesus and the Gospels, 2nd ed. (Zondervan, 2020), 49. 3 Schmidt, J&J, 1-2. Schmidt’s preferred translations are on pp. 137-138. 4 Strauss, FPOJ, 49-50. Strauss quotes from Shlomo Pines, An Arabic Version of the Testimonium Flavianum and Its Implications (Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1971), 16. 5 Fernando Bermejo-Rubio, “Was the Hypothetical Vorlage of the Testimonium Flavianum a ‘Neutral’ Text? Challenging the Common Wisdom on Antiquitates Judaicae 18.63-64,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 45, no. 3 (2014), 341. 6 Schmidt, J&J, 53. 7 Bermejo-Rubio, “Hypothetical Vorlage” 328. Bermejo-Rubio draws on L. Van Liempt and A. Bell. 8 Gary R. Habermas, On the Resurrection: Evidences, vol. 1 (B&H Academic, 2024), 196. 9 Schmidt, J&J, 8. 10 John P. Meier, “Jesus in Josephus: A Modest Proposal,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 52, no. 1 (1990), 85-87. 11 Paul Barnett, Jesus and the Logic of History, New Studies in Biblical Theology 3 (InterVarsity Press, 1997), 35. 12 Habermas, OtR, 197. Information about Klausner is from Habermas. 13 Schmidt, J&J, 71. Here Schmidt draws on Vincent Cernuda, and references Bammel. 14 Schmidt, J&J, 96. 15 Schmidt, J&J, 97. 16 Meier, “Modest Proposal,” 87. 17 David Black, New Testament Textual Criticism: A Concise Guide (Baker Academic, 1994), 24. 18 Schmidt, J&J, 50-51. 19 Alice Whealey, “The Testimonium Flavianum in Syriac and Arabic,” New Testament Studies 54, no. 4 (2008): 587. 20 Schmidt, J&J, 54. 21 Whealey, “Syriac and Arabic,” 575. 22 Habermas, OtR, 196. 23 Schmidt, J&J, 5. 24 Schmidt, J&J, 137. 25 Habermas, OtR, 199. When Habermas references the minority view on p.196, he references Daniel-Rops. 26 Habermas, OtR, 200. See also 199. 27 Habermas, OtR, 196. 28 Habermas, OtR, 201-202. Note: Regarding this episode’s discussion of historical data in Meier’s reduced TF, keep in mind that the Bible would not corroborate the idea that many Greeks followed Jesus during His lifetime—it was only small numbers at that time, for that people group (see Schmidt, J&J, 80). Sources for Paraphrased Material Intro and Question of Authenticity • Schmidt, J&J, 1-3, 5, 16. • Meier, “Modest Proposal,” 81. • Bermejo-Rubio, “Hypothetical Vorlage,” 327. Arabic Version • Whealey, “Syriac and Arabic,” 573-574. Whealey references Pines’s An Arabic Version of . . . • Schmidt, J&J, 50, 53. Vocabulary and Style • Bermejo-Rubio, “Hypothetical Vorlage,” 327-329. See his source(s). • Habermas, OtR, 196, 200. • Schmidt, J&J, 8. Meier’s 3 Deletions • Meier, “Modest Proposal,” 77, 84, 87-88. • Barnett, JLH, 35-37. Non-Human? • Schmidt, J&J, 2-3, 71-73, 137-138, 215. Raised? • Schmidt, J&J, 96, 98-100. See p100 n272. Fulfilled Prophecy? • Schmidt, J&J, 102. Schmidt draws on Lois Fuller’s data. • Schmidt, J&J, 101-103. Jesus Data from Meier’s Version • Meier, “Modest Proposal,” 88. • Habermas, OtR, 200. Note: Habermas apparently mixes in data from the Arabic version as well, not just from Joseph Klausner’s suggested version. • Bart Ehrman, Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, EPub (HarperOne, 2012), 50. Conjecture vs. Source Analysis • Whealey, “Syriac and Arabic,” 575. • Pines, An Arabic Version, 21. Syriac Version • Whealey, “Syriac and Arabic,” 574, 587-588. • Schmidt, J&J, 50, 52-63. Note: Schmidt draws on Silvia Castelli’s research (58, 61-62). • Whealey, “Syriac and Arabic,” 582-586. Note: Schmidt states that “Alice Whealey has . . . hypothesized that Michael and Agapius may have relied, perhaps indirectly, upon the now lost Chronicle of Jacob of Edessa (c.708 CE), though in her most recent publication she is somewhat circumspect about this conclusion,” see Schmidt, J&J, 56. Schmidt references “The Testimonium Flavianum in Syriac and Arabic” when referring to Whealey’s “most recent publication.” • Schmidt, J&J, 53 n114. Messiah Statement • Schmidt, _J&J,_1, 5-6, 38, 40, 51, 63, 137. • Whealey, “Syriac and Arabic,” 580-581. Whealey builds on Pines. • Barnett, JLH, 36-37. 100% Forgery? • Schmidt, J&J, 215-219, 222-225, 227. Overall Stance • Schmidt, J&J, 5, 137. • Schmidt has reason to accept Whealey’s suggestion (based on textual tradition) that one unimportant word should be subtracted from the TF (Schmidt, J&J, 104); the word is “ἔτι (which could be translated as ‘still’ or left untranslated” (Schmidt, 137). • Bermejo-Rubio, “Hypothetical Vorlage,” 363. Majority and Minority Views • Habermas, OtR, 196-200.