George Floyd Toxicology Report and Autopsy скачать в хорошем качестве

George Floyd Toxicology Report and Autopsy

Autopsy of George Floyd https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/06/0... https://www.scribd.com/document/46447... This is just my opinion. i am not a doctor. lethal dose of fentanyl https://www.oxfordtreatment.com/subst... blood in human body https://www.livescience.com/32213-how.... 5.5 liters of blood in his body, 2mg of fentanyl is considered to be fatal. do some math, cancel units of measure and.... 2mg/5.5L x 1L/1000mL x 1,000,000 ng/1mg = (2mg x 1L x 1,000,000ng)/(5.5L x 1000mL x 1mg) = 364ng/mL. on the toxicology report, #9 states that the average person loses consciousness at 34ng/mL, (roughly 1/10 of the fatal level). without being a doctor, these values from 2 different sources seems to match up as far as logic goes. this makes me question the quotes within this news report https://www.kare11.com/article/news/l..., "If he were found dead at home alone and no other apparent causes, this could be acceptable to call an OD. Deaths have been certified with levels of 3," Baker told investigators. In another new document, Baker said, "That is a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances." ok, multiple quotes, taking each one as information all by itself because nowhere within this report did i find the media actually citing the documents they are quoting (and people wonder why we dont trust the media). if i were Dr Baker, and law enforcement asked me "is there any situation where you would report these levels as an overdose?" i think the context of his answer "If he were found dead at home alone and no other apparent causes, this could be acceptable to call an OD. Deaths have been certified with levels of 3," makes alot of sense. he is simply saying that if it were a complete mystery how someone died, and they found this in his system, and they have to provide a cause of death. this is what they would write down as the cause. next quote, "That is a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances." how much is he refering to when he says "That"? what do you think? is my logic flawed? is the math correct? put your thoughts in the comments.