Comparable Sale Valuation Method скачать в хорошем качестве

Comparable Sale Valuation Method

Equipment Valuation I Construction plant and machinery valuation I Construction Equipment Valuation I Purpose of Valuation I Method of Valuation I Valuation Method I Comparable Sales Approach Valuation Method I Replacement Cost I Construction Plant and Machinery Valuation Report I Format of Construction plant and machinery valuation report I Example of Comparable Sales Approach Valuation Method Dear friends, This video will discuss about in brief about Comparable sales approach valuation method of construction equipment with example and format of reporting. We'll start presenting now. A ) Comparable sales approach valuation method of construction equipment The Comparable Sales Approach, often used in real estate, can also be adapted to valuing construction equipment. It involves evaluating the value of equipment based on the prices of similar or comparable pieces of equipment that have been recently sold in the market. Here's how it can be applied to construction equipment valuation: 1. Research Comparable Sales: 2. Identify Comparable Equipment: 3. Adjust for Differences: Age: Condition: Usage Hours: Geographic Location: 4. Consider Equipment Features: 5. Compile and Analyze Data: 6. Market Trends: 7. Documentation: B ) Example of comparable sales approach valuation method of construction equipment The comparable sales approach, involves comparing the construction equipment being valued to the sale prices of similar equipment in the market. Below is an example of how to apply the comparable sales approach to value a bulldozer: Example: Valuation of a Bulldozer 1. Equipment Identification: a. Equipment: 2017 XYZ Bulldozer Model BD-123 b. Make, Model: XYZ BD-123 Bulldozer c. Equipment Details: 5 years old, 6,100 operating hours, need repair, and regular maintenance. 2. Market Research: Research the market to identify recent sales of similar bulldozers in the same geographic region and market segment. 3. Selection of Comparable Sales: Identify three comparable bulldozer sales within the past six months that closely match the subject equipment in terms of make, model, age, operating hours, and condition. For example: a. Comparable Sale 1: 2018 XYZ BD-123 Bulldozer, 5,000 operating hours, sold for ₹ 25.2 Lac. b. Comparable Sale 2: 2016 XYZ BD-123 Bulldozer, 6,500 operating hours, sold for ₹ 21.4 Lac. c. Comparable Sale 3: 2017 ABC BD-200 Bulldozer, similar specs and condition, sold for ₹ 19.2 Lac. 4. Adjustment Factors: Analyze the differences between the subject equipment and the selected comparable sales. Common adjustment factors may include: a. Age: Adjust for the difference in age. b. Operating Hours: Adjust for the variation in operating hours. c. Condition: Adjust for differences in condition. d. Make and Model: Account for differences in make and model. e. Attachments or Modifications: Consider the presence of additional attachments or modifications. 5. Adjustment Calculation: Calculate adjustments for each of the identified factors to account for the differences between the subject equipment and the selected comparables. These adjustments should reflect the positive or negative impact on the value. For example: a. Adjustment for Age: Subject equipment is one year new then than Comparable Sale 1, so a depreciation adjustment of ₹ 1.2 Lac is made. b. Adjustment for Operating Hours: Subject equipment has 400 fewer operating hours than Comparable Sale 2, resulting in a positive adjustment of ₹ 1.4 Lac. c. No adjustments are necessary for Condition, Make and Model, or Attachments. 6. Adjusted Sale Prices: Apply the adjustment factors to the sale prices of the comparable equipment to arrive at adjusted sale prices for each comparable. a. Comparable Sale 1 Adjusted Price: ₹ 25.2 Lac + ₹ 1.2 Lac (age) = ₹ 26.4 Lac. b. Comparable Sale 2 Adjusted Price: ₹ 21.4 Lac + ₹ 1.4 Lac = ₹ 22.8 Lac c. Comparable Sale 3 Adjusted Price: ₹ 19.2 Lac. = ₹ 19.2 Lac 7. Weighting: Consider the relevance and significance of each comparable sale in the analysis. Assign appropriate weights to each comparable based on their similarity and relevance to the subject equipment. In this example, all comparables are given equal weight. 8. Final Valuation: Calculate the final valuation by taking the weighted average of the adjusted sale prices of the comparables. This represents the estimated market value using the comparable sales approach. Final Valuation = ( ₹ 26.4 Lac + ₹ 22.8 Lac + ₹ 19.2 Lac) / 3 = ₹ 66.4 Lac / 3. = ₹ 22.1 Lac 9. Valuation Conclusion: The estimated market value of the 2017 XYZ BD-123 Bulldozer, based on the comparable sales approach, is approximately ₹ 22.1 Lac as of [Date of Valuation]. This example demonstrates how the comparable sales approach can be used to estimate the market value of construction equipment by analyzing recent sales of similar equipment and making adjustments for differences between the subject equipment and the comparable.