Physical Disability in the Workplace (Lee et al 2026) | FT50 JoM скачать в хорошем качестве

Physical Disability in the Workplace (Lee et al 2026) | FT50 JoM

English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast starts at 00:21:09 Hindi Podcast starts at 00:36:50 Danish Podcast starts at 00:53:09 Reference Lee, W. E., Roccapriore, A. Y., Lohrke, F. T., & Reutzel, C. R. (2026). Physical Disability in the Workplace: A Comprehensive Review and Unifying Framework. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206325140... ‌ ‌Youtube Channel ⁠   / @weekendresearcher⁠   Connect over linkedin   / mayukhpsm   🎙️ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit. Somewhere between the elevator and the meeting room, between the laptop bag and the handshake, work asks a question it rarely says out loud. Not “Are you qualified?” Not “Are you ambitious?” But something quieter and more revealing: “Will the world be built for you today?” 🧩🏢 For millions of people, that question is not philosophical. It is physical. It lives in doorways that are almost wide enough, in timelines that assume one speed, in cultures that praise “grit” but quietly punish bodies that move differently. And what makes this so hard to study is also what makes it so easy to ignore. Disability gets averaged. Flattened. Bundled into categories that look tidy on paper, even when real lives are anything but tidy. 🧠📄 Today’s episode is anchored in a major new review that refuses to let the workplace off the hook with vague language. The paper is titled “Physical Disability in the Workplace: A Comprehensive Review and Unifying Framework” by Wyatt E. Lee, Ashley Y. Roccapriore, Franz T. Lohrke, and Christopher R. Reutzel. It was published online on 22 January 2026 in the Journal of Management, a prestigious FT50 journal. 🏛️✨ Drawing on 168168 articles, the authors do three things that matter. First, they offer a clear definition of physical disability that management research has long needed. Second, they map the mechanisms that shape workplace life, from lived experience to coworker attitudes to organizational structures and practices. Third, they show how outcomes like pay gaps, stalled advancement, and unequal evaluations are not random accidents. They are patterned, and those patterns shift with boundary conditions such as visibility and severity, and with how organizations design jobs, norms, and “fit.” 🔍📊 There is also a bracing honesty here about the state of the field. The literature is fragmented. Methods vary wildly. Too many studies collapse difference into one big bucket labeled “disability,” and then wonder why the findings feel thin. This review is a call for rigor, but also for attention. Not performative inclusion, but operational inclusion. Not slogans, but systems. ♿️⚙️ If you want more episodes where we translate top-tier research into ideas you can use and arguments you can build on, subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and subscribe to the YouTube channel Weekend Researcher. You can also find the show on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast. 🎧📺🍏 And with sincere thanks, thank you to the authors Wyatt E. Lee, Ashley Y. Roccapriore, Franz T. Lohrke, and Christopher R. Reutzel, and thank you to Sage Publications and the Journal of Management for publishing this work. 🙏📚 Now here is the question I cannot stop thinking about: if a workplace measures “performance” with precision, why does it so often treat access, accommodation, and dignity as negotiable? ❓🕰️