У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно 1 MIN AGO Canada Says NO to Trump's Energy Demands — White House LOSES as Carney Shuts Down Deal или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
#Canada #Trump #Energy In this video, we examine a defining moment on February 28th, 2026, when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney publicly rejected President Trump's proposed bilateral agreement that would have resolved the U.S.-Canada crisis in exchange for Canada signing a ten-year contract guaranteeing energy exports to the United States at capped prices and specified volumes. Carney's four-word response, "The answer is no," followed by a detailed explanation of why Canada will not trade resource sovereignty for temporary policy relief, represents a fundamental assertion of Canadian independence and triggers immediate energy market disruptions. This report walks through the rejection step by step, including: Details of Trump's phone call proposal including specific export minimums, price caps, and penalty clauses Why the White House believed the offer was generous and expected Carney to accept Emergency Canadian cabinet meeting where Carney argued the offer was "a trap" that would lock Canada into subordinate status Full transcript analysis of Carney's press conference explaining why Canada declined on sovereignty grounds Carney's announcement that Canada has received energy purchase proposals from eleven countries and will evaluate all on equal terms Immediate market reaction with U.S. crude jumping $8.40 per barrel and refinery stocks collapsing Evidence that Asian countries are actively negotiating long-term Canadian energy supply agreements Infrastructure analysis showing Canada can redirect exports within 18-24 months using NATO funding White House blindside and Trump's delayed response claiming U.S. doesn't need Canadian energy despite factual dependence Congressional reactions following established pattern with twelve Republicans blaming Trump's failure to offer partnership Three scenarios ranging from competitive bidding process to crisis escalation if U.S. attempts to block Canadian diversification This is a fact-based breakdown of a crucial negotiation rejection, presented in a clear, analytical format. The focus is on verified details of the proposed agreement, official government statements, market data, energy infrastructure realities, and implications of Canada prioritizing sovereignty over short-term crisis resolution. ⚠️ Important Note: This video is presented for educational and analytical purposes to explain resource sovereignty principles and how nations negotiate over strategic commodities. It is not intended to promote conflict or predict specific outcomes. If you are interested in resource diplomacy, energy markets, sovereignty negotiations, strategic commodity control, and how nations assert independence when facing pressure from larger powers, this analysis provides essential context and clarity. 📌 Subscribe for in-depth energy and diplomatic analysis 📌 Turn on notifications for breaking developments 📌 Share your thoughts respectfully in the comments DISCLAIMER: This video is an analysis and commentary based on official government statements, verified market data, energy industry reporting, and diplomatic sources. It is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment or policy advice. Viewers are encouraged to consult multiple sources and form their own opinions. 🔔 Subscribe for more in-depth international relations content 👍 Like if you found this analysis valuable 💬 Share your thoughts in the comments below #Canada #Trump #Energy #Carney #Oil #NaturalGas #WhiteHouse #Markets #Sovereignty #Trade #Resources #Breaking #Diplomacy #Crisis #NorthAmerica