Lawyer Joe Tacopina Breaks Down Why the Right Verdict was Reached in the OJ Simpson Trial (Part 2) скачать в хорошем качестве

Lawyer Joe Tacopina Breaks Down Why the Right Verdict was Reached in the OJ Simpson Trial (Part 2)

Watch full interviews early, uncensored and ad-free as a Member - https://www.youtube.com/vladtv/join Watch this Full Interview:    • Lawyer Joe Tacopina on Getting ASAP Rocky ...   Part 3:    • ASAP Rocky's Lawyer Joe Tacopina on Why Ro...   Part 1:    • Joe Tacopina on Switching from Prosecutor ...   -------- Renowned lawyer Joe Tacopina explained why he believes the not guilty verdict in the O.J. Simpson trial was the correct legal outcome, even if it might not have served justice for the victims. According to Tacopina, the evidence in the case was deeply compromised, raising reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors. He highlighted the key role of Mark Furman, the lead detective, who was discredited after taking the Fifth Amendment when questioned about his use of racial slurs and potential evidence tampering. Furman's actions, Tacopina argues, gave Simpson's defense a significant advantage and made it impossible to convict Simpson beyond a reasonable doubt. Although the trial was controversial and viewed as a poor example of the justice system, Tacopina feels the verdict adhered legally. The subsequent civil trial, which found Simpson liable under a lower standard of proof, was seen as fair by Tacopina.