The battle over who is ‘born American’ returns to the Supreme Court! скачать в хорошем качестве

The battle over who is ‘born American’ returns to the Supreme Court!

The Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order seeking to limit automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. The case, Trump v. Barbara, could have sweeping implications for immigration law and the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. In this video, immigration attorney Muhammad Amir from Amir Law Firm explains: The Executive Order at Issue Legal Challenges and Lower Court Rulings The Constitutional Framework The Administration’s and Plaintiff’s Argument Historical Context If upheld, the executive order would overturn more than a century of settled law and alter the very foundation of American citizenship. It could affect hundreds of thousands of children born each year, leading to widespread uncertainty over their legal status. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in April 2026, with a decision anticipated by June 2026. The outcome could redefine the meaning of citizenship and the limits of presidential authority under the Constitution. Amir Law Firm — Trusted immigration counsel for global professionals and U.S. employers. Contact Amir Law Firm for guidance: 212-372-4878 | [email protected] | www.amirlawfirm.com #SupremeCourt #BirthrightCitizenship #TrumpvBarbara #ImmigrationLaw #USCIS #14thAmendment #CitizenshipClause #WongKimArk #ConstitutionalLaw #ImmigrationNews #CivilRights #SCOTUS #USCIS #N-400 #Naturalization #Immigrationlaw #usimmigration #immigrationpolicy #immigrationattorney #lawyer #immigration #news ***This post contains attorney advertising. Prior results don’t guarantee a similar outcome. The information in this post is for general information purposes only and we are not responsible for outdated or inaccurate materials/information. Nothing in this post should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship