У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Republican Congresswoman EXPOSED Republicans For Protecting Ilhan Omar или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Nancy Mace just exposed what Congress is hiding — and her own party shut her down. In January 2026, Congresswoman Nancy Mace moved to subpoena Ilhan Omar's immigration records during the House Oversight Committee hearing on Minnesota fraud. Republicans joined Democrats to kill the motion in a voice vote. No roll call. No names on record. Just a quiet "aye" and it was over. Then Mace tried to force the release of all congressional sexual misconduct files after the Tony Gonzales scandal. 357 members of Congress — 175 Republicans, 182 Democrats — voted to bury it. She also exposed a taxpayer-funded slush fund used to pay off sexual harassment claims against members of Congress. Some years that fund hit $4-5 million of YOUR money. Meanwhile in Minnesota, the fraud keeps growing. Fahima Mahamud — the 79th person charged in the Feeding Our Future scheme — ran a daycare that pulled $10.2 million in child care assistance. She was caught at the airport trying to flee to London. A new daycare opened at the same address the very next day. A 22-year-old ran a $6 million autism fraud scheme in St. Cloud and just pled guilty — he told the judge he didn't know a single person with autism. 79 people charged. 51 guilty pleas. Billions gone. And the sitting congresswoman from Minnesota with an ethics referral, financial disclosure questions, and immigration fraud allegations confirmed by the Assistant Attorney General? Untouched. George Carlin was right. It's a big club — and you ain't in it. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE and hit the notification bell so you never miss a video 👍 LIKE this video — it helps more than you know 💬 DROP A COMMENT — Who else in Congress do you think is being protected? 📤 SHARE this video — email, text, WhatsApp, all of it SOURCES: Rep. Nancy Mace Press Release — Motion Blocked (Jan 8, 2026): https://mace.house.gov/media/press-re... H.Res.713 — Censure Resolution Against Ilhan Omar: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c... KARE 11 — Future Leaders Daycare / Fahima Mahamud: https://www.kare11.com/article/news/c... KARE 11 — Star Autism Center / Yussuf Guilty Plea: https://www.kare11.com/article/news/l... The Hill — House Kills Mace Sexual Misconduct Resolution: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/57... NBC News — Mace Forces Vote on Misconduct Reports: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/cong... 🚀 Click Here to join My Email Newsletter to get updates on the channel & More!: https://shorturl.at/VI3lh 🚀 CHECK OUT MY PATREON - Join my Patreon community today and help fuel our journey into uncovering scams, gaining financial insights, and empowering our lives – your support makes all the difference! https://bit.ly/4aN0K4n 🚀Try the BEST Budget App from Simplifi by Quicken! 30 Days Free https://bit.ly/3HrKAhB 🚀Support my Channel Venmo - @HannibalisHungry Cashapp - $HannibalisHungry . Credit to owner: - This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER:- Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.”