#CloudNativeWisdom18 скачать в хорошем качестве

#CloudNativeWisdom18

“Welcome to Cloud Native Wisdom, quick, sharp takes on the tech headlines. Today, Richard Simon and I unpack two big GenAI studies, one saying most pilots aren’t delivering value, the other saying most firms are seeing ROI. Who’s right? Let’s dig in.” Two major 2025 reports yielded very different headlines about enterprise GenAI adoption — MIT’s “GenAI Divide” finds that 95% of pilots show no measurable P&L impact, while Wharton’s multi-year survey reports that roughly three in four firms see a positive ROI from GenAI. In this short Cloud Native Wisdom clip, Richard Simon and I explain why the numbers aren’t contradictory; they measure different definitions of “success” and highlight differences between implementation and measurement. Timestamps 0:00 — Intro: Cloud Native Wisdom (host + series) 0:12 — Topic set-up: MIT & Wharton reports clash 1:00 — MIT report: the “95%” headline explained. 2:36 — Wharton report: ~75% report positive ROI 3:22 — Where to read both reports (links below) 4:36 — Why headlines spread: LinkedIn & media amplification 5:05 — Example: AWS outage + conflation with Amazon layoffs 7:37 — The danger of quick takes & how to evaluate claims 9:11 — Marketing chaos in GenAI (models, vendor claims, hype) 10:16 — Wrap up & final advice from Richard Reports / Further reading (links) MIT — The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 (Project NANDA / MIT) — PDF (report referenced in episode): https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/... Wharton — Gen AI Fast-Tracks Into the Enterprise — 2025 Wharton Human-AI Research full report (PDF): https://ai.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-conte...