Eos 5D mkII vs Kodak Gold: digital vs analog again скачать в хорошем качестве

Eos 5D mkII vs Kodak Gold: digital vs analog again

Puh, I don’t even know what to say about this test. I love shooting Kodak Gold, and as you might already know, I’m constantly haunted by the question why I tend to shoot film in the first place. To figure it out, I keep doing these silly tests to get a little closer to my own truth. What I didn’t anticipate with this test, though, was how much I’d actually learn about when not to choose Kodak Gold. :D In this test, I ignored my usual rule of overexposing film by one stop and underexposing digital shots by one stop. I rated both cameras at ISO 200, using the same aperture and shutter speed settings. And that’s where the (expected) problem appeared: The shadows on the Kodak Gold were far too dark and had to be lifted in post, which made the grain more visible and revealed that there wasn’t much detail captured there to begin with. The digital RAW files, on the other hand, contained much more information in both the shadows and the highlights. I find this super interesting, considering that film can have such incredible latitude — if you give it enough light, I guess. Hope we learned something today! :D As always, see for yourself and judge by your own standards. Thanks for watching! If you’d like to see more like this, consider subscribing. And if you want to support me even more check my Ko-Fi Page: https://www.ko-fi.com/the_analog_world   / the__analog__world