У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Did England Quietly Disappear? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Britain’s constitutional settlement has changed more in the last few decades than most people realise — and the consequences now reach into identity, speech, governance, and the question of who the country is for. In this episode of Thinking Class, I’m joined by Michael Reiners — writer, lawyer, and architectural historian — to unpack the distinction between England, Britain, and the United Kingdom, why the language has shifted so rapidly, and how constitutional reforms, devolution, and rights frameworks have reshaped the British state. This episode forms part of Thinking Class’ ongoing inquiry: The Question of the West — examining the political, cultural, and civilisational foundations of our common life. We discuss the “Yookayification” idea, the logic (and risks) of a Great Repeal approach to post-1997 constitutional reforms, and why any serious reform programme would need to confront the reality of the permanent state — the administrative machinery and quasi-independent bodies that can constrain elected power. Michael Reiners is a writer and lawyer with a background in architectural history (Cambridge). He publishes constitutional and legal commentary, including draft legislation and reform proposals, via the Reiners Project. Follow Michael Reiners on X: https://x.com/MCRReiners Visit the Reiners Project: https://reiners.org.uk/ Topics we explore: England vs Britain vs the United Kingdom vs. the 'Yookay' — what the words actually mean (and how they changed) Why “UK” is a very recent political identity Identity, citizenship, and why law doesn’t always reflect reality “Yookay-ification”, naming, and the politics of place Devolution, Human Rights, Equality frameworks — and unintended consequences What a serious constitutional “reset” would require (and what could go wrong) The “permanent state” problem: how reform attempts get contained or neutralised What cultural restoration could look like beyond slogans About Thinking Class: Thinking Class is an independent forum for long-form inquiry examining the political, cultural and civilisational questions shaping England, Britain and the West. Hosted by John Gillam, the show features serious conversations with historians, legal scholars, economists, theologians, politicians, and public intellectuals. Thinking Class is concerned with discovering long-term patterns over headlines and hot-takes. Expect historically-grounded analysis on matters of national character, institutions, demography, democracy, identity, inheritance, institutional continuity and social change. New episodes every week. ▶ YouTube: / @thinkingclass 🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/37vvzrl... ✍ Substack: https://thinkingclass.substack.com 🐦 X (Twitter): https://x.com/thinkingclasses Chapters 00:00 — Introduction 01:19 — From architecture to constitutional thinking 05:00 — England / Britain / UK explained 10:11 — Why “UK” is a modern rebrand 15:03 — “England is no more”? The argument and why it fails 23:04 — Demography, naming, and the future of the polity 30:29 — The coronation oath argument (and its limits) 36:05 — Restore Britain, “Great Repeal”, and the Blair settlement 45:50 — “How to Destroy a Hostile Constitution” (as a reform plan) 54:29 — Cultural restoration: canon, architecture, exemplar leadership 1:00:58 — What Michael changed his mind on 1:02:00 — Where to find Michael’s work