У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Inside the Brutal Killing Spree of Andre Chikatilo: A Forensic Breakdown или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
At age 42, he committed his first known murder, marking the start of a twelve year reign of terror. The Killing Spree, 1978 to 1990. Chicotillo's crime spanned from 1978 to 1990, primarily in the Rostov region of the Soviet Union. He killed at least 52 victims, though he confessed to 56, targeting women, girls. And boys. His victims were often vulnerable runaways, prostitutes or children lured with promises of food, money or alcohol. As a forensic scientist, the crime scenes reveal a pattern of extreme violence. Chicotillo's modus operandi, mo, involved luring victims to secluded areas, often near train stations or forests, where he would stab, mutilate and sometimes sexually assault them. Postmortem, the bodies were frequently found with multiple stab wounds, sometimes dozens. Evisceration and removal of body parts like eyes or genitals, suggesting a ritualistic component to his attacks. Forensically, the crime scenes were chaotic, yet consistent. Blood spatter analysis indicated frenzied attacks with high angle impact patterns from repeated stabbings. So men was occasionally found. But due to Chicotillo's impotence, sexual assault was often incomplete or post mortem, a detail critical to understanding his psychological drive. His signature mutilation, particularly eye removal, may reflect a need to dehumanize victims or avoid their gaze, a common trait in offenders with deep shame or paranoia. From a psychological perspective, Chicotillo fits the profile of a disorganized serial killer with sadistic and power control motivations. His impotence likely fueled his rage, leading him to substitute violence for sexual gratification. The mutilation and necrophilic acts suggest a need to dominate and possess victims entirely. His victim selection, often strangers or marginalised individuals, points to opportunism and the low risk of detection in the Soviet system where transient populations were common evasion and investigation challenges.