Supreme Court DENIES Appeal As Daughter ADMITS "He Made Me Part Of Fraud"? | Jack Smith скачать в хорошем качестве

Supreme Court DENIES Appeal As Daughter ADMITS "He Made Me Part Of Fraud"? | Jack Smith

This video provides professional legal analysis on federal fraud proceedings and Supreme Court appeals. Yesterday during six-week federal fraud trial, defendant's daughter who served as vice president of finance took witness stand wearing navy blue suit and testified she prepared financial statements from 2019-2022 with inflated property valuations after professional appraisals came in lower than needed to secure loans, stating her father instructed her to use higher numbers despite her concerns that using values different from appraisals constituted fraud, with father telling her "you are part of this company, part of this family, we do what needs to be done to protect both" implying refusal would betray family. When prosecutor asked why she participated knowing it was wrong, daughter began crying stating "because he was my father and I thought he knew what he was doing" before making direct eye contact with defendant and declaring "he made me part of the fraud" as seven-word admission acknowledging she signed and submitted false documents for three years obtaining millions in fraudulent loans but doing so because father she trusted completely told her to, creating direct evidence of his knowledge and intent. Defense cross-examination suggested daughter lying for immunity but she confirmed no immunity offered, testifying because subpoenaed and could not live with lies anymore, admitting anger that father used her trust and made her criminal. Trial concluded two weeks prior with jury convicting on all counts, defendant appealing to circuit court arguing daughter's testimony should have been excluded, circuit court denying appeals, defendant filing emergency Supreme Court petition arguing fundamental fairness required new trial, and yesterday Supreme Court issuing one-sentence order "petition for certiorari denied" meaning Court saw no constitutional issue worth reviewing from thousands of annual petitions where only one to two percent granted cert requiring four justices to vote yes. Supreme Court denial means conviction final, no more appeals, sentencing proceeding with fifteen to twenty years federal prison expected, and defendant serving sentence knowing daughter's testimony sealed his fate. Legal analysis explains daughter could face charges herself for signing false documents with prosecutor having discretion based on voluntary cooperation, truthful testimony, and genuine remorse, plus burden of both fraud participation and testimony that convicted father lasting forever. Family destruction discussed including defendant potentially in seventies when released with daughter middle-aged, questions whether father can forgive daughter who testified against him or daughter forgive father who used trust to commit crimes and turned her into accomplice by overriding moral concerns with family loyalty manipulation. Personal perspective recognizing core tragedy that defendant betrayed daughter by using position as father to compel criminal conduct. Evidence-based legal analysis with emotional storytelling anecdotal tone. AI Disclosure: This content utilizes AI-generated visuals. All information based on legal principles, Supreme Court procedures, and federal fraud standards. Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance made for fair use. This is transformative work with original commentary.