У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Thomas Massie TRAPS Pam Bondi: "Who Is The Secret Name You Are Hiding In Epstein Files?" или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Thomas Massie caught Attorney General Pam Bondi hiding Les Wexner's name in FBI documents flagging him as a potential Epstein co-conspirator. When Massie raised it publicly, DOJ quietly unredacted the name within 40 minutes — proving it was never about legal necessity. When Bondi couldn't explain it, she attacked Massie as a "failed politician" with "Trump derangement syndrome." In this video, we break down how a Republican congressman who wrote the Epstein transparency law caught his own party's AG red-handed. 📌 The 3 questions: FBI documents flagged Les Wexner as a potential co-conspirator but DOJ redacted his name — why hide a billionaire co-conspirator while exposing survivors' information? Massie raised the redaction publicly and DOJ unredacted Wexner's name within 40 minutes — if it could be fixed in 40 minutes, why was it hidden in the first place? When asked who made the decision to hide Wexner's name, why did Bondi attack Massie as a "failed politician" instead of answering, and why did Massie respond "I wrote the law you are violating"? 💬 What shocked you most — Les Wexner being flagged as a potential co-conspirator, DOJ fixing the redaction in 40 minutes after being caught, or Bondi calling Massie a "failed politician" instead of explaining who made the decision to hide the name? Drop your take in the comments. ⚠️ Disclaimer (Liability Waiver): This channel presents fictionalized narratives created for entertainment, commentary, and dramatization purposes. Any references to individuals, institutions, or events are not intended to directly reflect real-world facts or situations. Some topics may be inspired by past public claims or reports from weeks or months ago, and the content is not tied to a specific time period. Nothing on this channel should be considered news, official statements, or legal evidence.