Karen Read Trial Lieutenant Tully vs Basic Geography: Who Wins скачать в хорошем качестве

Karen Read Trial Lieutenant Tully vs Basic Geography: Who Wins

In this video, we break down the defense’s expert takedown of Detective Lieutenant Brian Tully’s testimony in the Karen Read trial — and yes, it includes math, maps, and more than a few moments that had us raising our eyebrows. Tully was brought in by the prosecution to testify about Verizon phone records, tower connections, and detailed maps that were meant to support their timeline. But as the defense began to dig in, it quickly became clear that something wasn’t adding up — literally. Tully admitted he omitted key directional data from the maps, didn't explain tower sectors, couldn’t define ENBID, and struggled with basic distance comparisons between two addresses. The result? A whole lot of confusion wrapped in “expert” testimony. The defense pointed out that without sector information from the towers, the maps are little more than vague circles — not precise indicators of location. And when the prosecution objected to a simple map that showed a tower was closer to the McCabe house than to 34 Fairview? It only made the cross-examination stronger. This wasn’t just about technical issues — it was about exposing how the state is trying to lean on data that doesn’t support their narrative when scrutinized closely. So grab your popcorn and your Google Maps, because we’re walking you through every hilarious (and seriously questionable) moment of this testimony. Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more defense-side trial coverage, and let us know: do you trust this tower testimony, or are you seeing right through it? #crime #trail #karenread #courtroomdrama #trialanalysis