У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Why Texas Elections Don’t Reflect Texas Voters или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Texas didn’t turn red. It was engineered that way. As Texas becomes younger, more diverse, and more urban, one question keeps coming up: if demographics are shifting, why do election results still look so solidly Republican? The answer isn’t voter ideology. It’s how political power has been structurally locked in through gerrymandering. What Happened After the 2020 Census, Texas gained new congressional seats due largely to population growth driven by Black, Latino, and Asian communities. But instead of drawing new districts where those voters could meaningfully influence outcomes, Texas Republicans redrew maps that cracked and packed growing communities to preserve GOP control. The result was fewer competitive districts, fewer seats where minority voters could elect candidates of their choice, and more safe Republican seats — even as statewide elections remained relatively close. Why This Rhetoric Matters When accused of racial vote dilution, Texas officials rarely talk about race directly. Instead, they use language like “urban versus rural voters,” “communities of interest,” or “partisan geography.” That framing is strategic. In Texas, race and partisanship overlap heavily due to decades of polarization. So when lawmakers claim maps are “race-neutral,” the racial effects remain predictable — and severe. This rhetorical move creates plausible deniability while delivering the same outcome: diminished political power for communities driving the state’s growth. Key Context the Public Often Misses • Gerrymandering doesn’t change statewide elections — it distorts how votes translate into seats. • Before 2013, Texas had to get federal approval before changing voting laws or maps. That safeguard disappeared after the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act. • Challenges to discriminatory maps now happen after elections, meaning damage is done before courts ever rule. • Even under these maps, cracks are appearing — including a 2025 special election where Democrats nearly flipped a deep-red Texas Senate district. • Texas is not an outlier. Its model has been copied by GOP-controlled states nationwide to entrench minority rule without overtly banning votes. This isn’t democracy reflecting voters. It’s voters being managed. Why This Is a National Story Texas shows how modern minority rule works: quietly, legally, and with technical precision. No tanks in the streets. Just maps, court delays, and carefully chosen language. Understanding this system matters — especially as candidates challenge the narrative that Texas is politically frozen. Once you see how it works in Texas, you start to recognize it everywhere. Sources & Further Reading • Texas Secretary of State — Historical Election Results https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections... • Texas Tribune — Texas Senate District 9 Special Election Coverage https://www.texastribune.org/2025/11/... • U.S. Department of Justice — Voting Rights Act Section 5 https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-sec... • Oyez — Shelby County v. Holder https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96 • Brennan Center — Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee Explainer https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wor... • League of Women Voters — Fair Maps Texas Litigation https://www.lwv.org/legal-center/fair... For clear, progressive analysis that exposes how power is actually maintained — and why democracy often fails to reflect the people — subscribe and stay informed.