New Claude Code GUI vs Cursor: Who Wins Vibe Code Planning and Cost? Is this Anthropic's First IDE? скачать в хорошем качестве

New Claude Code GUI vs Cursor: Who Wins Vibe Code Planning and Cost? Is this Anthropic's First IDE?

Chapters 00:00 Intro – Talk About All New Claude Code GUI 00:18 Show new Claude Code GUI Interface 01:27 Test prompt 02:27 Claude Code GUI Planning Results 04:39 Cursor Planning Results 06:11 Final Analysis Anthropic just dropped a brand-new Claude Code GUI, and honestly… it feels like their direct answer to Cursor 👀 In this video, I put Claude Code GUI head-to-head with Cursor and focus on the biggest differentiator between the two right now: project planning. I walk through how I’m using the new graphical interface to open a real Flutter project, select a working directory, switch into planning mode, and let Claude analyze an existing Android app built in Android Studio. Instead of just generating code, I’m testing how well Claude can understand an existing project, reason about it, and produce large-scale architecture plans — which is exactly where tools like Cursor have traditionally dominated. We keep everything practical and real-world: ✅ Open Claude Desktop → Code tab ✅ Select Flutter project folder ✅ Switch between Plan and Code modes ✅ Use Opus 4.5 inside Claude Code GUI ✅ Ask Claude to review the project ✅ Watch it explore the Flutter structure ✅ Compare planning output to Cursor To stress-test both tools, I give them a large planning prompt: 👉 Convert a minimal recipe app into a large-scale application 👉 Add Firebase 👉 Add authentication 👉 Add PostgreSQL backend 👉 Generate ERD 👉 Define primary & foreign keys 👉 Output XML database schema Claude Code GUI produces a full architectural overview, feature breakdowns (core, social, organization), database structure, ERD-style modeling, and multi-phase planning — all inside the new GUI. It even acknowledges the Flutter project type and Android app context automatically.  Now, I’ll be honest… Cursor still wins on planning polish. The formatting, diagrams, and overall structure inside Cursor are excellent. Cursor recommends Supabase, outlines PostgreSQL tables cleanly, shows relationships, provides XML schema, and wraps everything in a nice summary. But here’s the interesting part… Claude Code GUI didn’t even exist two weeks ago — and it’s already about 80% of the way to Cursor. That’s wild. I also talk about cost, because it matters: If you want to run Claude Opus 4.5, using Claude Code GUI directly on Anthropic’s $20 plan is currently much cheaper than piping Opus through Cursor. That alone is going to pull a lot of developers toward Claude’s native ecosystem. You’ll also see some of the current beta quirks: • Overlapping UI text • Occasional lockups • Archiving sessions without a true “unarchive” button • Archived vs active session confusion • Needing CLI commands to surface archived threads • Open in Cursor button (ironically awesome) • Add image support • GitHub connectors • Local vs cloud working directories • Copy path shortcuts • One-click access to CLI And yes… There are bugs. There are rough edges. But the direction is crystal clear. Anthropic is moving straight into the IDE + AI coding assistant arena, and Claude Code GUI is their opening move. If you’re wondering: ➡️ How close Claude Code GUI is to Cursor ➡️ Whether planning-first workflows actually work ➡️ If Claude can reason about large app architecture ➡️ What modern “vibe coding” looks like in practice This walkthrough shows you exactly that. Let me know in the comments what you want me to test next 👇 Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell!