У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Revealing Jury Questions in Karen Read Retrial! Will they reach a verdict? | Case Brief или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on @TheEmilyDBaker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/1FQDyZVIbho Day 35 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on June 17, 2025. We are on the 3rd day of Verdict Watch and the jurors had questions! 1) They asked about the specific time frame for the OUI (Operating Under the Influence) charge, whether it was 12:45 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The court responded that the jurors have all the evidence and are the sole fact-finders. 2) They asked if video clips of Karen Read's interviews were evidence and how they could consider them. The court affirmed that the videos are evidence and should be weighed like any other evidence. However, before considering any such statement, the jury must determine beyond a reasonable doubt that Read made the statement voluntarily, freely, and rationally. 3) The jury asked if convicting on a sub-charge (specifically offense two, number five, referring to the OUI) would automatically convict on the overall charges. The court introduced and read an amended verdict slip to clarify the process. Later, the jury sent another question while the court was deliberating on how to answer the first 3 questions. 4) They were asking if finding "not guilty" on two charges but being unable to agree on a third, results in a hung jury on all three or just one. The court's initial inclination was to respond that it was a theoretical question and could not be answered, as jurors are not to be concerned with the consequences of their verdict. The defense objected, arguing that it was a question about how to report a verdict, not its consequences, and that the jury instructions already addressed this. Ultimately, the court decided to respond that it was a theoretical question and thus unanswerable. No Verdict was made at the end of day, we'll see what happens on Day 36. RESOURCES What You Need to Know About the Retrial - • Karen Read Retrial. What you need to know ... Karen Read Retrial Playlist - • Live Trials with Emily D. Baker Karen Read Trial - 2024 - • Live Trials | Karen Read - 2024 Mistrial THE DOCKET 0:00 Road So Far 0:56 Judge Cannone Reads 3 Questions From The Jurors 4:37 Emily's Analysis of the Questions 7:53 The Answers Are Given to the Jury 14:28 Summary of the Answers 16:45 Jurors Ask A 4th Question 17:43 Some Clarification on the Timing of the Question 18:23 Attorney Jackson Argues for an Answer 20:29 Summary of New Question STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER Download Our FREE App: https://lawnerdapp.com Get the Free Email Alert: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Case Requests & Business Inquiries: [email protected] Help with the shop: https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/con... Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com LONG FORM CONTENT / @theemilydbaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowP... Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmily... Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmi... On your favorite podcast player Mondays EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker Instagram: / theemilydbaker Twitter: / theemilydbaker Facebook: / theemilydbaker MY YOUTUBE TOOLS **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd Follow My Cats on Instagram: / fredandgeorge_cat Emily’s glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC