У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно BIG U Legal Team Claims FBI Used Tainted Evidence for Wiretaps | Court Docs Explained или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
DAMU & KIWE CONVERSATIONS breaks down explosive new federal court documents filed by the defense team for Eugene “Big U” Henley. In this new motion, Big U’s attorneys argue that the same federal judge who authorized the FBI wiretaps should not be the one deciding whether that evidence should be suppressed. According to the filing, Ninth Circuit precedent requires that a different district court judge review motions to suppress wiretap evidence, creating what the defense calls a “second level of review.” show_multidocs The defense claims the FBI and federal prosecutors relied on distorted or misleading information in their wiretap affidavits, potentially violating the standards established in Franks v. Delaware, which governs challenges to search warrants and wiretap authorizations. show_multidocs The motion further argues that prosecutors strategically steered related cases from “Operation Draw Down” — a large federal investigation targeting alleged Rollin’ 60s members and associates — to the same judge who originally approved the surveillance. show_multidocs In this episode, Duse M'$ and the Damu & Kiwe Conversations platform examine: • Why Big U’s legal team says the wiretap evidence may be tainted • The claim that the FBI affidavits contained distortions and omissions • The argument that prosecutors forum-steered the case to the issuing judge • How Franks challenges could affect the admissibility of evidence • What this motion could mean for the future of the federal case We also break down the legal strategy behind suppression motions and what happens if a court determines that investigators misled the judge when seeking surveillance authorization. ⚠️ Disclaimer: ActiveChuckss Ent. provides commentary and analysis of publicly filed court documents and allegations. These claims are subject to court review and have not been adjudicated. 🎥 DAMU & KIWE CONVERSATIONS Investigating hip-hop culture, federal cases, and industry politics. #️⃣ Hashtags #BigU #DamuAndKiweConversations #FederalCourt #WiretapEvidence #FranksMotion #OperationDrawDown #HipHopNews #ActiveChuckssEnt Sources