HIGHLIGHTS: DANIEL HAQIQATJOU VS ADNAN RASHID скачать в хорошем качестве

HIGHLIGHTS: DANIEL HAQIQATJOU VS ADNAN RASHID

Ustadh Adnan Rashid repeatedly advises Brother Daniel Haqiqatjou. Let's all listen to this advice and apply it to ourselves and make dua for all parties. Ameen. Timestamps 0:00:00 - Importance of knowledge 0:01:00 - Hyde Park reference 0:02:45 - Sitting with scholars 0:05:45 - Importance of ikhlas 0:07:00 - Importance of Arabic and Hifdh 0:14:00 - Sincere heart to heart advice 0:16:11 - Conclusion ...... ** New Rule (Proposa and Ideal) ** If someone wants to engage in Online Inter-Sunni Debates or Online Refutations -- they have to prove that they have at least completed all FIVE (5) of the prerequisites below. Otherwise, they will end up harming the community, and will not realize it until years later, due to deeper level of qualifications required. They will also be over-platforming themselves, taking away the voices of those with more knowledge. Lastly, they'll end up consuming our attention and distracting the youth, when the Ummah's time could be should invested elsewhere. Prerequisite to Engage in Fueds with Fellow Muslims Have they memorized Imam an-Nawawi's 40 Hadith? Or any Arbaoon/Matn for that matter? Have they memorised at least 2 or 3 Juz of the Qur'an with Tajweed and Makharij Al Haroof? Do they have a foundation in Arabic to the extent they can pick up a contemporary or classical book and understand it? Can they share the names of at least two of their teachers (Tullabul Ilm, Mashayikh, Mentors) with whom they've sat with for at least two years, and once per week? Have they studied at least 1 Text (or Matn) in Arabic with a teacher in person, demonstrating that they were able to humble themselves and expose themselves to some level of tarbiyah and adab? Chances are: if they really CARE about that particular topic, they will go back and learn the above. And by the time they complete all of the above, they will probably have found someone else to address that issue, or will have dropped the issue altogether, realizing they're unqualified. And also, if they were involved in Dawah at one point, they'll go back to what they were good, and will stay within their focus area. Also, if we don't do this, it means that it's easy to influence our community, the bar is low, and we can easily be infiltrated. .... I have a question. And please, I welcome anyone here to clarify, advise, or correct me publicly. The last thing I want to do is cast doubt or aspersions on anyone. Brothers have done much more than me. The last thing I want is for anyone to have Suu Al Dhan of them. I'm curious about the evolving landscape of Islamic discourse. It seems that individuals who may not have extensive traditional Islamic education, such as deep Arabic fluency, Quran memorization, or formal study in advanced Aqeedah, are increasingly engaging in public discussions on these complex topics. I'm not questioning anyone's intentions. I'm simply observing this trend and wondering: How do we ensure that the dissemination of knowledge on such sensitive and nuanced matters remains grounded in robust scholarship and authentic understanding? What are the responsibilities of both those who engage in such online aqidah debates and spread knowledge (and those who receive it) in this context? I believe that certain individuals have undoubtedly made valuable contributions to the intellectual discourse within our community. Brothers for example, have demonstrated expertise in refuting certain ideologies. Others, have done a great job in unpacking Christianity. But does specialization in one area automatically qualify someone as an authority in other subjects? What is the bar now to be a Talibul Ilm? If you ask me if Brother XYZ is an expert in Dawah, I would response with an absolute YES. Or if you ask me if Br ABC is good resource in refuting Liberalism, I'd say YES. But if you ask me if either of these people can speak on the differences between Asharis, Maturidis, and Atharis... Please help me understand HOW that happened. And to be clear, such Brothers are probably among some of the "better" examples, of people who care about Islamic studies. But does that give them a pass? Is the online environment they're creating having a trickle effect? Can anyone speak to the same effect (even without undertaking rigorous studies, memorized texts, sitting with teachers, learning adab and tarbiyah)? Why is it also that the more knowledgeable people on these subjects refrain from such public debates? Perhaps because they cause more fitna than benefit, and because there is more ego involved than actual academic integrity? Some of these debates seem more of a form of entertainment. The scary thing, as we consume this content, we forget about the actual Quran and Sunnah, the practical deeds we should be doing, in the community, in our homes etc... I'm guilty myself.