У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно DOJ Challenges Massachusetts Gun Ban in Major Second Amendment Court Battle или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a major amicus brief in federal court arguing that Massachusetts’ handgun roster system violates the Second Amendment. In the case Granada v. Campbell, now before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the DOJ states that firearms “in common use” by law-abiding Americans cannot be banned — a principle rooted in landmark Supreme Court rulings such as District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago. Massachusetts’ approved handgun roster restricts which models licensed dealers can sell, blocking popular firearms such as newer-generation Glock pistols, despite their widespread legal use across most of the United States. According to arguments referenced in the brief, commonly owned firearms — including models produced in large numbers annually — fall under constitutional protection. The DOJ also rejects the claim that residents can simply purchase firearms in another state, emphasizing that constitutional rights should not depend on interstate workarounds. Another key issue in this case is whether the Second Amendment protects not only possession, but also acquisition of firearms. The DOJ argues that the right to keep and bear arms necessarily includes the right to obtain them. Without lawful acquisition, the ability to exercise the core right becomes meaningless. This case could have nationwide implications. Several states, including California and others, operate similar handgun roster systems and regulatory structures. If courts adopt the DOJ’s reasoning, the decision may influence how states structure firearm regulations moving forward. Legal experts are closely watching whether this case could advance to the U.S. Supreme Court, potentially reshaping Second Amendment jurisprudence. We break down the legal arguments, what this means for gun owners, how roster systems work, and why this federal filing has sparked significant debate across the country. Stay informed on constitutional law, federal court cases, and developments that could impact firearm policy nationwide. 👍 If you value clear breakdowns of major constitutional cases, like this video. 🔔 Subscribe for updates on federal court decisions and Supreme Court cases. 📢 Share this analysis with others interested in Second Amendment news. #SecondAmendment #DOJ #GunRights #Massachusetts #FederalCourt #SupremeCourt #2A #GunLaws #Constitution #LegalNews This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and court rulings may change over time. Viewers should consult qualified legal professionals for specific legal guidance. This video does not promote or encourage violence or unlawful activity.