Performance Comparison | ACC vs iRacing vs rFactor 2 скачать в хорошем качестве

Performance Comparison | ACC vs iRacing vs rFactor 2

EDIT: I changed the title to 'Performance Comparison' because many people did not like the appearance of ACC graphics here. This is not a comparison of how each sim can look on it's max settings. It is a comparison of how they all look when targeting the same frame rate. Quick comparison of the overall look of the 3 main sims. Porsche Cup (992) at Brands Hatch GP. Used the same time of day and weather settings for all games here to make it a fair comparison. The settings are literally just what I use. I prioritise having it run smoothly at highish frame rates. It is track dependant too. Most often I see rF2 locked at 164 fps while I see iRacing dipping into the 130s. So while I could tweak things to maximise performance in this example, I thought it is more fair to share them with the real world settings I actually use. To give a rough idea of how things look using the same hardware. Afterburner in the top left too so you can see fps etc. I recorded the onboard clips while actually driving, rather than from the replay. I wanted to show the actual performance I was seeing as I was driving. I normally run with the steering wheel hidden, but enabled it so there's some more to look at in the video. I don't normally run HUD, but I do have the radar enabled in ACC and rF2. My computer is a 5600 with 6700XT GPU and 16GB of RAM. Monitor is 3440x1440 165 Hz. 0:00 Onboard - ACC 1:48 Onboard - iRacing 3:30 Onboard - rFactor 2 5:31 TV Cam - ACC 7:06 TV Cam - iRacing 8:50 TV Cam - rFactor 2 10:32 Settings - ACC 10:57 Settings - iRacing 11:14 Settings - rFactor 2 11:32 Computer Specs