China Stole The F-35 Blueprints. One Critical Flaw Made Their Version Useless. скачать в хорошем качестве

China Stole The F-35 Blueprints. One Critical Flaw Made Their Version Useless.

Here is the optimized short video description for "China Stole The F-35 Blueprints. One Critical Flaw Made Their Version Useless." In 2016, Chinese hackers pulled off the heist of the century. They stole over 630,000 files from US defense contractors, including the detailed blueprints for the F-35 Lightning II. Beijing thought they had checkmated American air power. They built a copycat jet—the J-31—that looked identical to the US original. But they forgot one thing. You can hack a computer, but you can't hack physics. While the F-35 runs on an engineering marvel that pushes the limits of material science, China’s copycat was forced to run on ancient, smoky engines because they couldn't replicate America's secret "Single Crystal" metallurgy. They stole the shell of a Ferrari, but they had to put a lawnmower engine inside. In this video, we break down how a microscopic flaw in the metal turned China’s terrifying stealth fighter into a slow, smoky target. In this video: 🕵️‍♂️ The Heist: How a Chinese spy walked away with America's biggest secrets. 👯 The Copycat: Inside the J-31—the jet that is identical to the F-35... on the outside. 🔥 The Melting Point: Why Chinese engines melt at temperatures American engines love. 💨 The Smoke Trail: Why you can't be "Stealth" if you leave a cloud of black smoke behind you. 👇 The Question: Do you think quality engineering always beats stolen designs? Type "MADE IN USA" in the comments if you trust American Steel! TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 The Heist of the Century 4:00 Act II: The Copycat (Meet the J-31) 8:00 Act III: The Melting Point (The Critical Flaw) 13:00 Act IV: The Smoke Trail (Why Stealth Failed) 17:00 Act V: The Black Box (The Verdict) Copyright Fair Use Disclaimer: The material presented in this video is not exclusively owned by us. It belongs to individuals or organizations that we deeply respect. Its use follows the guidelines of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.