У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Parallels of History: The Burgos Cathedral Door Controversies of 1790-1791 and 2025 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Did you know that Burgos already faced a major controversy over the west façade back in 1790–1791? The debate was fierce, the government in Madrid intervened, and the bishop’s project was stopped. In this video I tell the story of that earlier conflict and explore how different it was from the intervention proposed today. What was once a desperate attempt to save a collapsing portal has become a twenty-first-century debate over heritage, identity, and the meaning of historical layers on a World Heritage cathedral. ¿Sabías que en Burgos ya hubo una gran controversia sobre la fachada occidental en 1790–1791? El debate fue intenso, el gobierno de Madrid intervino y el proyecto del obispo quedó detenido. En este vídeo cuento aquella historia y analizo en qué se diferencia de la intervención propuesta hoy. Lo que entonces fue un intento desesperado de salvar un portal en ruina se ha convertido ahora en un debate del siglo XXI sobre el patrimonio, la identidad y el valor de las capas históricas en una catedral Patrimonio de la Humanidad. — Source: Nieto Plaza, Ana Berta. “La obra de la puerta de Santa María en la Catedral de Burgos (1790–1791).” Boletín de la Institución Fernán González 78, no. 219 (1999): 339–376.Nieto Plaza’s article is a very useful study of the 1790–1791 renovation of Burgos Cathedral’s west façade, showing how neoclassical ideals from Madrid collided with the older Gothic fabric of a provincial city. It reveals the tensions between local authorities, the archbishop, and the Real Academia as late Bourbon Spain tried to enforce a centralized artistic policy on a region that had long since faded from its sixteenth-century prominence. The piece is a great lens into how northern Castile negotiated identity, authority, and style at the end of the Spanish Empire.