Is Modern Gibson Hardware Bad?? (+ Faber Upgrades) скачать в хорошем качестве

Is Modern Gibson Hardware Bad?? (+ Faber Upgrades)

Welcome to Perky's Analog Gear Demos. Please subscribe for more demos of vintage & rare effects pedals! So today folks, I wanted to take a look at hardware. I changed the bridges on my Tele & Esquire a while back, and the bridge/trem assembly on my Strat, and very much enjoyed the (subtle) results. I've read so much on forums over the years about modern Gibson hardware - and many people who have done the comparison have said that it's not fantastic when compared to the vintage Gibson and aftermarket reissue stuff. I wanted to look into this further. So I'll be treating my Gibson SG to a completely new set of hardware from Faber in Germany...how much difference will it make? I'll be swapping the tailpiece (to Faber's lightweight solid aluminium one...which REALLY is lightweight!!), the bridge (from the current Nashville Tune O Matic to Faber's "ABRN"); as well as the studs and bushings. The bushings are what are directly in contact with the guitar body, so I didn't want to neglect them. What do you think? An improvement? Or was the Gibson stuff absolutely fine? Which did you prefer? Comment below! Guitar is a 2012 Gibson SG Standard with OX4 Low-Wind PAF pickups; recorded through a Dr Z Z-Wreck (Celestion AlNiCo Gold; Aston Spirit Condenser and '70s Sennheiser MD441) and a Dr Z DB4 (Celestion AlNiCo Cream; sE RNR1 ribbon) with a Schoeps CMC6 room mic. jp@joeperkins.co.uk Vector images by freepik.com