У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Blake Lively's DISGUSTING PR MOVE: Justin Baldoni DEFAMED by Lawyer in Shocking Documentary или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
#blakelively #justinbaldoni #itendswithus A new documentary on Max and ID discovery called "In Dispute" dives into the legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. The problem is the lawyer used for the show has a SERIOUSLY flawed argument for why Blake's action of taking over the film are justified. Blake's case is also claimed to be stronger - but the facts suggest otherwise. Support the Channel By Becoming a Member: / @withoutacrystalball Follow Katie Joy on Social Media: Instagram: / withoutacrystalball Facebook: / withoutacrystalball Disclaimer: Without a Crystal Ball is a commentary channel. The views expressed by Katie Joy are her opinions and should not be considered fact. Katie Joy discusses trending topics, current events, reality tv & More. This channel is for your entertainment. Please make sure you conduct your own research on any topics to verify any information. All Clips Obtained through TLC YouTube & Used under Fair Use: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.” THIS VIDEO AND OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL IN GENERAL MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.