Identifying a LSAT Logical Reasoning Statistics Flaw w/ Official PrepTest 158 Section 4, Question 6 скачать в хорошем качестве

Identifying a LSAT Logical Reasoning Statistics Flaw w/ Official PrepTest 158 Section 4, Question 6

Watch expert LSAT tutor, Stefan Maisnier, demonstrate how to proactively identify the main conclusion of a Logical Reasoning argument to inform a broad prediction of what a reasonable argumentative flaw might be, in this case that an expected result is directly proportional to another variable, using Question 6 from Section 4 of LSAT PrepTest 158. By watching this demonstration that uses free official resources from lawhub.lsac.org, you will learn how to execute a similar style of reasoning vulnerability identification using the available interface highlighting tools for future argumentation task Logical Reasoning questions on practice or official LSAT exams. Please like this video if you find the information in it helpful as you continue your LSAT journey and subscribe to this channel to receive notifications about new explanation videos when they become available. To learn more about the LSAT or the law school application process, visit the MyGuru LSAT & Law School Admissions blog at www.myguruedge.com/our-thinking/lsat-and-the-law-school-admissions-process or visit https://www.myguruedge.com/book_intro... to book a free LSAT instruction consultation. To learn more about the instructor, visit https://www.myguruedge.com/team/stefa.... LSAC LawHub LSAT PrepTest 158 Logical Reasoning Section 4, Question 6: If the proposed air pollution measures were to be implemented, ozone levels in the city's air would be one fifth lower than current levels. Since the ozone in our air is currently responsible for over $5 billion in health costs, we would spend about a billion dollars less on these ozone-related health costs should the proposed measures be adopted. 6. The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it A) fails to consider the possibility that other types of pollution not involving ozone might rise, perhaps even producing an overall increase in health costs B) presumes, without providing evidence, that ozone-related health costs in the city vary roughly in proportion to ozone levels (Correct) C) provides no explicit reason for believing that the proposed air pollution measures will in fact be adopted D) attempts to support its conclusion by making an appeal to emotions E) discusses air pollution in order to draw attention away from more significant sources of health-related costs