У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Isaiah Berlin – Two Concepts of Liberty | Negative vs Positive Freedom Explained или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Isaiah Berlin’s Two Concepts of Liberty, originally delivered as a lecture in 1958, is a foundational work in modern political philosophy that draws a critical distinction between two rival understandings of freedom. Negative liberty is defined as the absence of external interference—particularly from the state—while positive liberty is the ability to act according to one’s rational will or true self. Berlin traces the intellectual lineage of both ideas and highlights their political implications, arguing that while positive liberty can inspire moral and social progress, it has also been historically used to justify coercion when monopolized by authoritarian ideologies. Central to his argument is a defense of value pluralism—the recognition that human goods are multiple and often in conflict—and a caution against monist visions of politics that seek totalizing answers. Berlin’s essay remains essential for understanding the conceptual terrain of liberty and the risks involved when noble ideals become tools of domination. Content: 1. The Problem of Freedom – Berlin’s Question I. Examines the Cold War backdrop and Berlin’s philosophical concerns about the ambiguity of “freedom” as a political ideal. II. Explores how the concept of liberty has been used to support contradictory ideologies. III. Sets the stage for the need to distinguish between different types of liberty. ________________________________________ 2. Negative Liberty – Freedom From I. Defines negative liberty as non-interference by others, especially the state. II. Traces its roots in classical liberalism through thinkers like Hobbes, Locke, and Mill. III. Emphasizes the political importance of a private sphere and institutional limits on power. ________________________________________ 3. Positive Liberty – Freedom To I. Defines positive liberty as self-mastery or governance by rational will. II. Connects the idea to thinkers such as Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx. III. Shows how positive liberty can shift from personal autonomy to collective control. ________________________________________ 4. The Dangers of Monism – When Liberty Justifies Coercion I. Analyzes how monist ideologies use the language of liberty to enforce conformity. II. Illustrates how positive liberty, when absolutized, can become a tool of oppression. III. Introduces Berlin’s value pluralism as a safeguard against political coercion. ________________________________________ 5. Choosing Between Liberties – The Liberal Balancing Act I. Discusses the tension and trade-offs between positive and negative liberty. II. Reaffirms Berlin’s warning that liberty must be protected from ideological overreach. III. Concludes with a defense of liberal pluralism and the need for vigilance in free societies. #politicalscience #politicalphilosophy #politicaltheory #philosophy #philosopher 0:00 The Problem of Freedom – Berlin’s Question 1:42 Negative Liberty – Freedom From 3:27 Positive Liberty – Freedom To 5:38 The Dangers of Monism – When Liberty Justifies Coercion 8:05 Choosing Between Liberties – The Liberal Balancing Act