У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Lt. Brian Tully's DELIBERATE REFUSAL TO INVESTIGATE 34 Fairview in the Karen Read trial, Jackson cr или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
VEROSCOPE Statement Analysis of Lieutenant Brian Tully's cross-examination by Alan Jackson in the Karen Read trial. We examine his testimony through forensic linguistic analysis, highlighting potential patterns and inconsistencies. This crime investigation requires a close look at the refusal to investigate 34 Fairview Road Canton Massachusetts. We will look at Lt. Brian Tully's Internal Affairs Investigation in detail in another Veroscope, but first, we examine his excuses for the deliberate NON investigation of the death of John O'Keefe. Lt. Tully admits no search warrant sought for 34 Fairview. VEROSCOPE forensic linguistics reveals why his language conceals about Karen Read. In this Part 1 of our Lt. Brian Tully cross-examination analysis, VEROSCOPE forensic linguistics methodology reveals: • "Supposedly" - expertise disowned at the moment it's challenged • "Not illegal" repeated twice - legal defense nobody asked for • "Given other information I had" - never specified, never explained • Three undefended admissions - "Correct. Correct. Correct." [silence] 30 linguistic patterns converge on one decision: Why wasn't 34 Fairview searched when a Boston Police officer was found dead 30 feet from the house? This is the Karen Read trial like you've never seen it—through the lens of what language conceals, not what people say. #KarenRead #karenreadtrial #ForensicLinguistics #StatementAnalysis #TrueCrime ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── DISCLAIMER ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ⚖️ DISCLAIMER: This VEROSCOPE analysis is for educational and investigative purposes only. Findings represent investigative intelligence based on linguistic pattern analysis, not legal conclusions. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. For private analysis and interviewing / assessment services, where knowing the truth is of strategic importance, email in confidence to VeroscopeAnalysis@Gmail.com Follow the Trial Channel for the best courtroom trial editing on Youtube.