У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно SWIG vs ctypes: Which Python Tool Should You Choose for Shared Libraries? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Explore the differences between `SWIG` and `ctypes` for interfacing Python with shared libraries. Learn when to choose each tool, their performance metrics, and development considerations. --- This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/135834/ asked by the user 'Kevin Little' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14028/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/135966/ provided by the user 'Thomas Wouters' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17624/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions. Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python: SWIG vs ctypes Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l... The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 2.5' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 2.5' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license. If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com. --- SWIG vs ctypes: Which Python Tool Should You Choose for Shared Libraries? When you're working with Python and need to call functions from shared libraries written in C or C++, you might find yourself pondering a pivotal question: should you use SWIG or ctypes? Each tool offers unique advantages and challenges, which can significantly affect your project. In this post, we will dive into the circumstances under which SWIG is a better choice than ctypes, and what the performance metrics look like for both. Understanding the Tools What is SWIG? SWIG (Simplified Wrapper and Interface Generator) is a powerful tool that generates the necessary C or C++ wrapper code to interface with Python. While it can create bindings for multiple languages, it is particularly useful when dealing with complex C/C++ functions. What is ctypes? ctypes, on the other hand, is a foreign function interface (FFI) for Python that allows you to call functions in DLLs or shared libraries directly from Python. It demands that the developer has a good understanding of C data types but does not require writing any additional C code. When to Choose SWIG? Choosing SWIG can be advantageous in the following scenarios: Multiple Language Wrappers: If you plan to generate bindings for multiple programming languages, SWIG simplifies the process and can save time. Complex Functions: For functions that have intricate parameters or output types (like structures or arrays), SWIG often handles the translation hassle-free, although it may require some knowledge of CPython's object representation. Maintaining a Large Codebase: SWIG shines when you are wrapping a substantial codebase, as it can automate much of the interfacing process, making it easier to manage large volumes of code. Performance Considerations In terms of performance, the compiled C/C++ code in SWIG often runs faster compared to the interpreted Python code with ctypes due to compile-time management. Still, unless you're making numerous calls to several different C functions, you may not notice a significant difference in overhead during runtime. When to Choose ctypes? The ctypes library offers its own set of benefits, particularly in the following situations: Simplicity in Development: ctypes is easy to start with. You can call a single C function without any prior configuration or compilation, allowing for quicker prototyping and testing directly in the Python interpreter. Direct Library Access: If you need to explore or call functions in various shared libraries with minimal setup, ctypes lets you dive right in without additional overhead. Lower Learning Curve: For simple or one-off tasks, you won't need to learn about interface files, warnings, or file generation, making it a more accessible option for beginners. Challenges with ctypes However, there are some things to keep in mind when using ctypes: Understanding C Concepts: A solid grasp of C data types, memory management, and structure alignment is essential for avoiding potential pitfalls. Manual Data Translation: It often requires manual translation of C structures and types to their ctypes equivalents, which can become tedious for complex data structures. Conclusion Both SWIG and ctypes have their unique strengths and weaknesses. SWIG is generally preferable for larger projects or those requiring multi-language support. In contrast, ctypes is a better choice for simpler tasks and quick, straightforward projects. In choosing between the two, consider the complexity of your code, the level of control you need, and the effort you’re willing to invest in understanding the underlying mechanics. Whichever path you choose, both tools will let you harness the power of C and C++ within your Python applications effe