Automated vs Manual Pen Testing: Why the Debate Is Wrong скачать в хорошем качестве

Automated vs Manual Pen Testing: Why the Debate Is Wrong

In this video, Shaun Peapell, Global VP of Threat Services at Rootshell Security, breaks down the real difference between automated and manual penetration testing — and why treating them as competitors is a mistake. Too often, organisations are told they must choose automation or human-led testing. Shaun explains why effective security requires both, and how attackers exploit the gaps when testing becomes one-dimensional. 🔍 In this video, you’ll learn: What automated penetration testing is good at — and where it falls short Why manual testing still matters against real-world attacker behavior How combining automation with human expertise closes risk gaps What security leaders should look for beyond “checkbox testing” If you’re a CISO, security leader, or practitioner, this video will help you cut through the noise and make smarter decisions about your testing strategy. 👍 Like the video if this helped 💬 Comment with your experience — automated, manual, or both? 🔔 Subscribe for more practical, real-world cybersecurity insights