🥊 Smigga’s Take - Episode 2: “Do You Have To Have Boxed To Speak On Boxing?” скачать в хорошем качестве

🥊 Smigga’s Take - Episode 2: “Do You Have To Have Boxed To Speak On Boxing?”

Why do boxing fans settle for mediocre, unqualified opinions? In this episode of Smigga’s Take, I tackle the age old debate: Do you have to have boxed to speak on boxing? I break down why TV and online panels are packed with unqualified voices, how the US multi sport pundit model hurts the sport, and where the line sits between fan opinion and real expertise. We look at examples from Stephen A. Smith, Chris Mannix and Max Kellerman, talk scoring, bias, and respect for fighters, then finish with a quick Joseph Parker vs Fabio Wardley preview and prediction. Expect: straight talk, real experience, no fluff. Join in: comment your take, like, and subscribe for weekly episodes. 🥊 #Boxing #Pundits #BoxingDebate #Usyk #ParkerWardley ▶ Topics: • Why boxing’s misunderstood by its own media • Stephen A. Smith • Chris Mannix • Max Kellerman • Simon Jordan - showing us the opposite side of the coin • How fans lose when real fighters are silenced • Your tweets, reactions, and the week’s best posts • Preview of: Parker vs Wardley This Saturday, Live on DAZN. 📲 Subscribe for new episodes every week. 💬 Drop your thoughts below - Does boxing really need more real voices, or more showmen? 🎥 Follow @PaulSmithBoxing on YouTube, 📸 Follow @PaulSmithJnr on Instagram and X/Twitter Keywords: expert vs fan, scoring fights, DAZN, TalkSport, Oleksandr Usyk, Anthony Joshua, Tyson Fury, Joseph Parker, Fabio Wardley boxing, pundits, boxing debate, smigga, paul smith, smiggas take, the smith brothers, max kellerman, chris mannix, stephen a smith, simon jordan, hbo boxing, boxing commentary, fight talk, boxing media, uk boxing, boxing analysis