Sen. Gallego EXPOSES Bessent's Plan To Pay Trump $10B In Taxpayer MONEY скачать в хорошем качестве

Sen. Gallego EXPOSES Bessent's Plan To Pay Trump $10B In Taxpayer MONEY

During a Senate Banking Committee hearing, Senator Ruben Gallego questioned Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about a $10 billion lawsuit filed by the President against federal agencies—a case where Bessent himself would authorize any settlement payment.In a detailed exchange, Gallego walked through the procedural framework: the lawsuit targets agencies under the Treasury Department's jurisdiction, any judgment or settlement would be paid from accounts administered by Bessent, and the authorization process places Bessent in the position of approving a payment to the individual who appointed him and retains the authority to remove him from office.Bessent's defense centers on statutory obligation. He characterizes his role as ministerial—a payment officer executing transactions as directed by legal outcomes, without discretion to block or modify them. He states repeatedly that he has "no say" in the matter and describes himself as following whatever determination the Justice Department reaches.Gallego challenges this characterization. He frames the situation not as routine procedure but as a structural conflict where the official authorizing payment serves at the discretion of the individual receiving it. The lawsuit concerns tax return leaks that occurred during the President's first term, under officials appointed by that same President. Now, the remedy being sought is a multi-billion dollar payment from taxpayer funds, authorized by a cabinet secretary who can be dismissed at will.The exchange escalates when Gallego describes the mechanics not as legal compliance but as "plundering US taxpayer dollars." This terminology—repeated three times for emphasis—shifts the framing from procedural question to accountability challenge.The hearing highlights a central question: Does the existing legal framework permit a sitting President to sue the federal government, receive a settlement approved by his own appointee, funded by taxpayers, for actions that occurred under his own administration? And if the law permits this, does the structure itself create a conflict that undermines accountability?Bessent maintains he is bound by statute. Gallego argues the structure enables self-dealing regardless of statutory language. The record of this exchange is now public. The legal process will determine the outcome. But the question of whether the system allows this arrangement—and whether it should—remains open.This is not partisan commentary. This is a documented Senate hearing examining a procedural conflict embedded in federal accountability mechanisms. The transcript is available. The lawsuit is filed. The questions raised are structural, not speculative.Watch the full exchange. Review the framework. Decide whether the system is functioning as designed or whether the design itself creates a problem. #Trump #ScottBessent #RubenGallego #TrumpLawsuit #IRS #Treasury #Corruption #ConflictOfInterest #TaxpayerMoney #Senate #Politics #Breaking #MAGA #GOP #Democrats #Accountability