У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Viewing Private Instagram (And How it works in Theory) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
For those of you finding the brag too long and boring, here are the major keypoints: 1) You HAVE to have an account in Instagram in order to view another account that is private. Unlike access to public accounts, which are accessible to an unregistered IP address, private accounts request cache from user's devices. If no cache is present, you would ONLY see the generic "This account is private" phrase. And yes, you can see the number of posts, followers and following without the need to rely on cache, except you can't click on any of those (continue reading why). So, even logically, any program which would offer to you to view a private account should FIRSTLY ask for a username anyway. 2) Instagram accounts use javascript cookies in order to store data (like any other major web service offering to store personal data do). These cookies are both server-based and registry-based, meaning that the privacy "switch" is a feature modifying given parameters for a server thread, pretty much like on Web 2.0 forums. By changing "True" to "False" or "1" to "0" or whatever these are called there, it AUTOMATICALLY creates a condition of not allowing ANYONE to view the posts of a given account, with the EXCEPTION of those present in the "Followers" list. So now, not only do you have to have an Instagram account, you also need to be present on the list of followers. What is the use of a program that cannot log in as one of the followers in order to give access to those posts? And even if it could, wouldn't it be logical to just crack the password instead? Facebook accounts do get cracked quite constantly, even in 2017. 3) Bruteforce rules all. The funniest thing is that the pics themselves are available via direct link viewing ending on 01010101_101010_10101_n.jpg, for example (much like in Facebook). And any system could dig them up by bruteforce, using the method of replacing numbers. However, how much time could that take in theory. A couple of minutes for an internet website? Seriously? Or maybe completing a survey would help? You tell me and prove me wrong, I'd really like that. Because in theory, everything I brag about works, but how to implement it in practice?