Mom Didn't Like It in JAIL for Not Providing Parenting Time скачать в хорошем качестве

Mom Didn't Like It in JAIL for Not Providing Parenting Time

Defendants motion to hold plaintiff in contempt and for immediate resumption parenting time Miss Carla Titus, a CPS investigator with the state of Michigan, testified in court about an investigation involving the Mom and Dad. The allegations included putting a child at unreasonable risk and physical abuse by the father, Ryan, and his girlfriend. However, the allegations were not substantiated during the investigation. Titus did not observe any marks or bruises on the children during her visits. She recommended no services for the family and closed the case without evidence to support the allegations. Titus did not visit the mother's home but spoke with her over the phone. The investigation was conducted within 48 hours of the incident. The children reported no physical injuries, and there were no marks observed during the examination. The son reported being shaken but had no visible bruises. The forensic interview protocol was followed during the investigation. During the investigation, Gleason was not aware of any ongoing litigation in the family law matter, but he was informed of a custody dispute between the parents. Both parents reported issues regarding parenting time and custody, with past altercations between them. It was reported to Gleason that they could not come to a consensus on certain aspects of parenting time and visitation. The witness discussed the interactions between Ryan and the children, particularly focusing on the phone calls and the children's reluctance to engage. The witness advised the children not to discuss important matters during phone calls and to save them for in-person meetings. There were previous issues of hostility during phone calls, especially with Ziggy feeling upset, but the situation has improved slightly. The children have expressed safety concerns, such as Kelsey refusing to ride in the car with Ryan due to a scary incident. The witness recommended validating the children's feelings about an allegation of Ryan shaking Rider, as it is their reality. Chelsea's behavior towards encouraging the children to spend time with Ryan was also discussed, with concerns raised about her potentially influencing the children against their father. The counselor suggested addressing makeup parenting time carefully to avoid perceptions of punishment or rejection. The issue of Ryan missing events due to work or other commitments was mentioned, with the counselor emphasizing the importance of clear communication with the children. An incident involving Father's Day plans was also discussed, with different perspectives on how Ryan handled the situation. Overall, improving communication and coordination between the parents and counseling sessions involving both parents and the children were suggested to address these issues effectively. Makeup time generally means that if a parent loses time he/she should have had with the other child, that the parent can have additional time during the year to make up for the lost time. If the parents can’t agree to makeup time, the family court may order makeup time. John Holder testified in court about his daughter Chelsea, his relationship with her, and the custody and visitation issues involving his grandchildren Ryder and Kenzie with their father Ryan. Holder explained how Chelsea had turned the children against him and Ryan, making it difficult for him to see them except at sporting events. He shared observations of the children's behavior, stating that they seemed to avoid their father and that he believed Chelsea was manipulating them. Holder also mentioned an incident where Chelsea tried to involve the police or Child Protective Services in a situation involving Ryan. The court established a temporary visitation schedule for Ryan with the children, allowing him to gradually make up for missed parenting time. Chelsea and Ryan were ordered to continue counseling and follow the recommendations of the counselor. The speaker acknowledges the agreement reached through negotiations after a hearing, with both parties agreeing to be bound by it. The judge emphasizes the importance of resolving parenting time issues for the well-being of the children involved, citing statistics that show adverse effects on children when parents have an adversarial relationship. The judge warns of potential jail time for parents who do not comply with parenting time orders, urging them to prioritize their children's needs. Mom is Refusing to Return the Child to Dad after the Judge Granted Dad Temporary Custody | Drama    • Mom is Refusing to Return the Child t...