$842B Budget. Only $170B of Combat Power. скачать в хорошем качестве

$842B Budget. Only $170B of Combat Power.

Why Record Spending Doesn't Buy Record Power The United States spends more on defense than the next 10 nations combined. But does $1 of budget equal $1 of combat power? When you strip away the overhead, the actual budget for purchasing ships, planes, and munitions—the "Procurement" budget—is only a fraction of the headline number. In this forensic audit of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), we break down the $672 Billion Gap between what the taxpayer spends and what the military actually fields. We analyze the "Tooth-to-Tail" ratio to expose the structural reality: The "Iron Triangle": Why Operations & Maintenance (O&M) and Personnel costs eat nearly 80% of funding before a single weapon is built. The Inflation Trap: How the Defense Industrial Base absorbs budget increases without increasing output. The "Rust" Tax: Why maintaining a global fleet costs more than building a new one. This is not political commentary. This is a systems analysis of the Pentagon's purchasing power and the logistical bottlenecks that define modern warfare. "Most channels focus on the explosions. We focus on the economics and logistics that make them possible. If you want the math behind the war, subscribe." #DefenseBudget #MilitaryLogistics #Procurement #Geopolitics #TacticalFuture #IndustrialBase 2. Chapters (Timestamps) 0:00 The $672 Billion Gap (Headline vs. Reality) 0:40 The Legal Constraints of the Budget 1:09 The Audit: The "Big Four" Cost Buckets 1:43 Personnel: The "People Tax" on Firepower 3:14 O&M: The Rising Cost of Rust & Readiness 5:30 R&D: Paying for Future Capability 6:00 Procurement: The $170B "Hard Cap" 6:55 Unit Costs & The Timeline Trap 8:08 The "Lag" Effect: Funding vs. Delivery 8:52 Industrial Base Constraints (Why Money Can't Fix It) 9:56 Why Procurement Always Gets Cut First 11:22 The Structural Verdict