Objective YouTube Critics Are Lying to Themselves скачать в хорошем качестве

Objective YouTube Critics Are Lying to Themselves

Many critics online claim to be objective. That they remove emotion from the process and are able to determine the quality of a film based on consistent, logical scales. The chief architect of this model of review is MauLer and EFAP, who claim that they are completely objective when reviewing anything. I disagree. Fundamentally. Hot take: but MauLer is not as objective as he has claimed to be, nor are his methods all that logical. In this video, we will examine MauLer's past work. We will only draw comparisons that MauLer has already drawn comparisons to: his fellow critics, from HBomberguy to Patrick Willems, all of whom...appear to not like him very much. Chapters: 0:00 Objective Criticism in Function 2:33 The Origins of Objective Criticism 4:15 My Challenge To Examine Objective Criticism 5:44 Mauler – His Opinions are Facts 8:02 Plot Holes vs. Plot Contrivances 14:56 The Secret Structure of Mauler’s Arguments 24:46 Arguments Based on Objective Reasoning vs. Opinions 30:04 Are There Objectively Bad Films? (The Room, Birdemic) 34:14 Summary vs. Review 38:13 Mauler’s One Man War Against Hbomberguy 52:44 The Biggest Reason Objective Criticism Fails 59:22 Shifting Opinions and Learning From Mistakes 1:07:07 Consistent Logic in Film and Criticism 1:12:08 In My Opinion as a Shield 1:16:52 I’m So Tired of This Guy 1:22:12 A Surprising Discovery 1:24:29 Presentation Trumps Content 1:26:37 Is Mauler...Falling Off?