• ClipSaver
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own скачать в хорошем качестве

Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own 5 месяцев назад

скачать видео

скачать mp3

скачать mp4

поделиться

телефон с камерой

телефон с видео

бесплатно

загрузить,

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Best Practices for Reusing Classes in an Ontology: When to Subclass and When to Define Your Own

Discover the best practices for reusing classes in an ontology and learn when it's appropriate to subclass. Understand the implications of using existing ontologies for better interoperability. --- This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/74797700/ asked by the user 'harryd' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7287213/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/74834237/ provided by the user 'IS4' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1424244/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions. Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Reuse existing classes in an ontology Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l... The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license. If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com. --- Reusing Existing Classes in an Ontology: Best Practices Explained In the world of ontologies, the ability to reuse existing classes from other ontologies can be a powerful tool in building your own framework. However, this practice comes with its own set of questions and considerations. One common concern is whether it's good or bad practice to subclass an item from another ontology or if it's advisable to define your own subclass. Let’s dive deeper into this topic to clarify the best course of action. Understanding RDF and Ontologies To begin with, it's integral to understand what RDF (Resource Description Framework) is about. RDF primarily deals with "facts" asserted by a specific graph, including details about a particular ontology. In the RDF realm, the unique identifier (URI) of an ontology item is not the primary concern; all ontologies exist within "your" graph. When you reuse existing classes, particularly when they are part of the linked data network, the implications can change considerably. That's why knowing the speculative guidelines on this matter can save you from potential issues down the road. The Interoperability Dilemma Speaking for Others One of the essential rules in ontology design is to avoid making assumptions or statements about items from another dataset unless it's necessary. This means an ideal practice is to ensure that at least one node in your RDF triple relates directly to your dataset. For instance: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] In this example, you're inferring something about a foreign class http://OtherOntology/Area. This could be problematic if users of your ontology have a different interpretation or understanding of that class. Thus, introducing ambiguity can lead to contradictions—especially if mappings don’t align across various vocabularies. Using owl:imports If possible, adopting the owl:imports method for importing classes can be greatly beneficial. This allows you to reference existing ontologies directly if they are published using OWL (Web Ontology Language). Conversely, if OWL is not available, consider publishing relevant segments of the ontology independently, while still referencing it with the help of rdfs:isDefinedBy. Encouraging Reuse for Maximum Interoperability Despite the concerns, reusing classes is encouraged for ensuring wide interoperability among different datasets. For instance, using well-established classes like http://schema.org/Place and http://OtherOntology/Area is not just permissible but often advisable. Here’s why: Compatibility: Using recognized classes facilitates integration with other datasets. Reduced Redundancy: This avoids the need to reinvent the wheel by creating similar classes with overlapping functionality. Enhanced Discoverability: Leveraging existing classes often increases the chance of your ontology being referenced or utilized. Conclusion When it comes to reusing classes in your ontology, weighing the benefits against the risks is crucial. While you should certainly consider subclassing items from other ontologies, ensure that you do not inadvertently misrepresent information or create contradictions. By properly utilizing owl:imports or referencing other ontologies using rdfs:isDefinedBy, you can maintain clarity and reinforce the integrity of your data. Remember, the key is to always strive for maximum interoperability while facilitating clear communication among different datasets. In the end, the art of ontology design lies in striking a balance between leveraging existing knowledge and articulating your own unique contributions. Happy designing!

Comments

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5