У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Comparing Self-Inquiry Methods: Ramana, Nisargadatta, Rupert Spira & Classical Advaita или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In this video, I compare different self-inquiry approaches from Advaita Vedanta and modern non-dual teachers. What makes Advaita unique is that it doesn't rely on blind faith or devotion to something external. Instead, it turns inward through direct self-inquiry — exploring who or what we truly are. I explore: Ramana Maharshi’s teaching on the I-thought as the root of all other thoughts, and how abiding in the sense of “I” leads to the dissolution of ego. Nisargadatta Maharaj’s focus on resting in the I Am — how this dissolves into the Absolute. The Direct Path from Atmananda Krishna Menon, developed through Jean Klein, Francis Lucille, Greg Goode, and Rupert Spira — looking not at the “I” but directly at experience to see there is no separate subject or object. The Classical Advaita Vedanta analytic methods — including Drig-Drishya Viveka (Seer and Seen), the unchanging vs. changing, and sentient vs. insentient — and how these help reveal what is truly you. Along the way, I reflect on my personal experience with these approaches, including insights from meditation and how certain practices resonate more than others. I also share a simple but powerful self-inquiry exercise from classical Advaita that made a real impact for me. Which of these approaches works best for you? Let me know in the comments! #AdvaitaVedanta #Nonduality #SelfInquiry #RamanaMaharshi #Nisargadatta #RupertSpira #GregGoode #Consciousness