У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Anti-Nuke: Applications and Mechanism | Rusted Warfare или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
#rustedwarfare Patreon: / aironium Facebook: / aironium Youtube: / @aironium Twitter: / general_airon Itch: https://aironium.itch.io Discord: / discord ------- To back my statements: I asked Luke: "I just noticed an odd behaviour with anti-nukes. Remember they have ranges right? However, in 2 different scenarios, there will be 2 results. 1. If a nuke will land outside the range of an anti-nuke stuff (AND, Carrier, Modular Spider), they will not intercept the missile - even if it passes on that range. 2. If a nuke will land inside the range of an anti-nuke stuff, the missile will be intercepted even when it is not yet within the range of that anti-nuke Idk if it is intended or not, but nevertheless, please fix the 1st scenario/condition" Luke replied: "1. That's setup like that mostly for FFA scenarios where you might be wasting anti-nuke missiles on nukes not targeting your base and instead an enemy. 2. If that doesn't happen then missiles targeting the very edge of the intercept range could hit before the interception missile hits. But there is likely a fair bit of room to reduce this padding. I agree that point 1 kind of doesn't make sense as it is, unless the nuke was still in orbit or something."