Reviewing Aman Duggal's response to скачать в хорошем качестве

Reviewing Aman Duggal's response to

Arvind Animal Activist and Aman Duggal had a debate where there were some major confusions about basic phil and nutrition topics on both sides. So here is my review of their back and forth responses. Hope this helps people learn how to interact with these phil-dependent talking points. Thanks to Melon Pult from Vegan India Discord for editing this video. Timestamps: 0:00 : Introduction and Disclaimer 2:44 : Aman yapping about trolley problem 5:14 : Ethics crash course 10:22 : This ain't meta ethics 16:55 : Informal fallacy rant 22:17 : Did arvind concede? (morality="subjective") 23:32 : Normie usage of "subjective" 28:26 : Not an expert montage 30:20 : Did arvind concede?(missing nutrient arg) 32:00 : More rambling about subjectivity 33:44 : "We can arrive at veganism only using logic" 37:07 : Does animal life matter more than human life? 41:57 : Is-ought fallacy explained 58:35 : "Creatine deficiency" claim 1:02:51 : Aman's response to darshan (ntt) 1:08:32 : Miscellaneous Link to my Insta post about Logical Fallacies:   / c9do1vos_6n   My Amazing Prop Logic Course:    • Philosophy: Prop Logic Course   My links: https://linktr.ee/appoota