Why William Craig’s Kalam Cosmological Argument Backfires on Christianity | God's Cosmos Ep. 12 скачать в хорошем качестве

Why William Craig’s Kalam Cosmological Argument Backfires on Christianity | God's Cosmos Ep. 12

To learn more about Why Islam is True Course go here: https://whyislamistrue.com/course To learn more about Basira's Classical Curriculum in Modern Context Click Here: https://www.basiraeducation.org/curri... In this episode of God’s Cosmos, Shaykh Hamza explains why the popular Kalam Cosmological Argument, as used by Christian philosopher William Lane Craig, fundamentally differs from the original Muslim argument developed by classical scholars of Kalam. While Craig uses the Big Bang to argue for the existence of a Creator who later enters time (to account for Jesus as God), Shaykh Hamza shows that this leads to a contradiction: a being who can enter time is contingent—not necessary—and therefore cannot be God. Shaykh Hamza presents the Qur’anic Argument from Contingency, which shows that everything in the universe—including Jesus—needs something else to exist. Since Jesus began to exist, he is contingent, not necessary, and therefore cannot be God. The necessary being—who is unchanging, independent, and the source of all existence—is Allah alone. This episode emphasizes that the original Muslim Kalam argument, rooted in the Qur’an and classical theology, not only proves the existence of God but also refutes the idea of Jesus being divine. Shaykh Hamza invites viewers to dive deeper by joining his online course “Why Islam Is True”, a structured, rational journey through four prophetic arguments for the truth of Islam—designed to equip Muslims with the tools to think critically, engage with modern challenges, and develop deep conviction in their faith.