Locke's argument against innate ideas and debating if it is harmful to Descartes' cogito ergo sum скачать в хорошем качестве

Locke's argument against innate ideas and debating if it is harmful to Descartes' cogito ergo sum

Briefly explain Locke's arguments against innate ideas. Do you think these arguments are damaging to Descartes' conviction that he has at least one innate idea: that he is thinking and that he exists? Please like and subscribe - comment too! I'd love to hear if they helped you it would be an encouragement to continue... 0:00 Introduction 01:12 Citing 01:46 Locke's Argument on Innate Ideas 12:00 Debate on Locke's Argument vs Descartes' cogito ergo sum 26:01 Signing off & Final Thoughts EGCC Introduction to Philosophy References in APA (links available upon request as YT will not let me post external links however this should provide plenty of info to find them): Lacewing, M. (2014). Locke vs Leibniz on innate knowledge. A Level Philosophy. Retrieved August 24, 2022 Markie, P., & Folescu, M. (2021, September 2). Rationalism vs. Empiricism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved August 24, 2022