У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Ernest Becker -- The Denial of Death или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Ernest Becker’s The Denial of Death is one of those books that doesn’t just present an argument—it quietly rearranges the furniture in your mind. It asks a single, unsettling question and then refuses to let go of it: What if much of human behavior is driven by our terror of dying? Not fear in the everyday sense, but a deep, mostly unconscious dread that shapes our personalities, cultures, ambitions, and conflicts. Becker starts from a simple but profound observation. Human beings are strange animals. On the one hand, we are physical creatures—vulnerable bodies destined to decay and disappear. On the other hand, we possess imagination, self-awareness, and the ability to think symbolically. We can conceive of infinity, meaning, and transcendence, even while knowing that our bodies will someday fail. This contradiction, Becker argues, creates an unbearable psychological tension. We know we are going to die, and yet we cannot truly accept it. To manage this tension, we develop what Becker calls hero systems—cultural and personal frameworks that allow us to feel significant, enduring, and “special” in a universe that otherwise seems indifferent. These systems can be religious, political, artistic, professional, or even personal. They tell us that our lives matter, that we are part of something lasting, that we will leave a mark. In traditional societies, religion offered literal immortality through the soul or the afterlife. In modern secular cultures, immortality is often symbolic: legacy, fame, achievement, children, ideology, or moral righteousness. Much of what we call “normal” behavior, Becker suggests, is actually an elaborate defense against existential terror. We cling to our beliefs not just because they are true or useful, but because they protect us from the raw fact of mortality. When someone challenges those beliefs, it can feel like an attack on our very existence. This, Becker argues, helps explain the intensity of ideological conflict, nationalism, religious wars, and even everyday interpersonal hostility. Threaten someone’s meaning system, and you threaten their psychological survival. Becker draws heavily from Freud, Rank, Kierkegaard, and existential philosophy, but he pushes their ideas further. He reframes mental illness as a breakdown in one’s immortality project. Neurosis, depression, and anxiety arise when a person’s chosen hero system no longer works—when it fails to convincingly protect them from death anxiety. Psychosis, in extreme cases, can be seen as a desperate attempt to construct a private immortality system when shared cultural ones collapse. One of the book’s most uncomfortable insights is that there is no easy escape from this dilemma. We cannot simply “see through” our defenses and live without them. To be human is to need meaning, structure, and some sense of transcendence. The danger lies not in having hero systems, but in mistaking them for absolute truth and using them to dominate, dehumanize, or destroy others. Becker is especially wary of modernity’s attempt to replace religious transcendence with purely human-centered solutions. When humans try to become gods to themselves, the results are often disastrous. Despite its bleak subject matter, The Denial of Death is not a nihilistic book. Becker does not argue that life is meaningless, only that meaning is fragile and costly. He hints—carefully—that the healthiest stance may involve a kind of humility: recognizing our symbolic constructions for what they are, holding them lightly, and resisting the urge to turn them into weapons. There is an ethical undercurrent here, even if Becker never fully resolves it. In the end, the book leaves you with a paradox rather than a prescription. We cannot live without illusions of meaning, yet we suffer greatly when we absolutize them. We long for transcendence, yet remain trapped in bodies that will fail us. Becker doesn’t offer comfort so much as clarity—and for many readers, that clarity is unsettling, illuminating, and strangely liberating all at once.