У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно 移民局拒絕一永久居民申請因申請人未在限期内提交所需文件 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
移民局拒絕一永久居民申請因申請人未在限期内提交所需文件 IRCC Refused A Permanent Resident Application Because The Applicant Did Not Submit A Requested Document ircc-refused-a-permanent-resident-application-because-the-applicant-did-not-submit-a-requested-document 背景 • 申請人正在根據家庭保姆計劃與家人一起申請2022年永久居留 • 移民局要求她在 2023 年 3 月之前補交文件,申請人要求移民局允許她在 2023 年 6 月 30 日之前提交文件。 • 移民局 批准延期申請,但必須 2023 年 6 月 14 日或之前遞交所需文件。 • 申請人再次請求延期至2023年10月31日,但沒有證據表明該請求已發送給移民局 • 移民局 於 2023 年 9 月拒絕她永久申請。 • 她尋求司法復核 加拿大移民官評語 • 所謂的第二次延期補交文件請求並未提交給移民局 • 由於申請人未能提供 [加拿大移民法] 第 16(1) 款要求的所有相關證據和文件,移民官員確定無法確定 [申請人] 滿足永久居留要求。 加拿大聯邦法庭評語 – 不允許司法復核 • 申請人未證明已向移民官員提出第二次延期補交文件請求。因此,這不是決策者拒絕批准延期或忽略延期請求的情況 • 移民官員決定屬合理與合理 • 本次司法覆核申請被駁回。 總結 • 務必提交空快遞等證據,並確認收到已向移民局提交補交文件的延期信。 Background •The Applicant is applying for permanent residence with his family under the Home Child Care Program in 2022 •IRCC requested additional information by March 2023 and the applicant requested to submit the documents by June 30, 2023. •IRCC granted the request of extension to June 14, 2023. •The applicant requested another extension to October 31, 2023, but had no evidence that the request has been sent to IRCC •IRCC refused her application in September 2023. •She sought judicial review Comments from The IRCC Officer •The alleged Second Extension Request was not before the Officer •The Officer determined that it cannot be established that [the Applicant] meet[s] the requirements for permanent residence due to the Applicant’s failure to produce all relevant evidence and documents required by subsection 16(1) of the [IRPA]. Comments From The Federal Court Of Canada •The Applicant has not demonstrated that the Second Extension Request was put to the Officer. Consequently, this is not a case where a decision-maker refused to grant an extension or ignored an extension request •The officer’s decision is reasonable •This application for judicial review is dismissed. Lessons Learned •Always submit evidence such as airway bills and acknowledge receipt that letters of request extension have been submitted to IRCC. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact Halcyon Counsel to find out more about this and other programmes that could help you start a new life in Canada. //CONTACT US// Phone – 852 2815 9066 / Whatsapp 852 5783 3174 Email – [email protected] //FOLLOW US// ►Facebook / halcyoncounsel ►Website https://halcyon-counsel.com/