irshad bhtti vs mirza muhmmad ali injneyr! jaj ny mafi q mangi ? скачать в хорошем качестве

irshad bhtti vs mirza muhmmad ali injneyr! jaj ny mafi q mangi ?

In the context of the recent release of Engineer#MuhammadAli Mirza and his first podcast with #IrshadBhatti, the "apology" by the judge (Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani of the Islamabad High Court) became a major talking point. The judge did not apologize because the accused was "innocent" of any religious debate, but rather because of how the state and the legal system handled the case. Here are the specific reasons why the judge expressed regret: 1. Misuse of the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) The judge was furious that the state machinery (Police and FIA) had sought a legal opinion from the Council of Islamic Ideology against Mirza. The Reason: According to the Constitution, only the President, Governor, or Parliament can seek an opinion from the CII. The Apology: The judge remarked that the state acted "illegally" by involving the CII in a private criminal complaint. He apologized for the fact that a citizen had to face such a flawed process. 2. Harassment through Multiple FIRs The judge noted that dozens of FIRs were being registered across different cities for the same statement. The Reason: This is a tactic often used to keep someone in jail indefinitely (whenever they get bail in one case, they are arrested in another). The Apology: Justice Kayani stated that the justice system should not be a tool for harassment. He expressed regret that the system allowed a citizen to be "dragged" through courts in this manner. 3. "Systemic Failure" During the proceedings, the judge famously said that if the courts or the state have caused undue suffering to a citizen due to procedural illegalities, the court must acknowledge it. He apologized on behalf of the "System" for failing to protect the basic constitutional rights of an individual against a mob-driven or state-sponsored narrative. Highlights from the Irshad Bhatti Podcast In their first sit-down together, Irshad Bhatti and Mirza Engineer discussed these exact court moments: The "Human Rights" Angle: Irshad Bhatti emphasized that his support wasn't necessarily for Mirza's religious views, but for his constitutional right to speak without being lynched or illegally imprisoned. Mirza's Response: Engineer Mirza explained that the judge’s apology was a "victory for the Constitution of Pakistan," not just a personal victory for him. The "Script": They discussed how certain elements tried to use the law to silence Mirza, and how the Islamabad High Court's intervention broke that "script." Summary: The judge's apology was an act of judicial activism to highlight that no matter how controversial a person's views are, the state cannot break its own laws to punish them. Would you like to know more about the specific constitutional clauses the judge used to dismiss the CII's report?