• ClipSaver
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik скачать в хорошем качестве

Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik 9 months ago

video

sharing

camera phone

video phone

free

upload

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research - Elisabeth Bik

Abstract: Science builds upon science. Even after peer-review and publication, science papers could still contain images or other data of concern. If not addressed post-publication, papers containing incorrect or even falsified data could lead to wasted time and money spent by other researchers trying to reproduce those results. Several high-profile science misconduct cases have been described, but many more cases remain undetected. Elisabeth Bik is an image forensics detective who left her paid job in industry to search for and report biomedical articles that contain errors or data of concern. She has done a systematic scan of 20,000 papers in 40 journals and found that about 4% of these contained inappropriately duplicated images. In her talk, she will present her work and show several types of inappropriately duplicated images and other examples of errors or research misconduct. In addition, she will show how to report scientific papers of concern, and how journals and institutions handle such allegations. Finally, she will address the growing problems of 'paper mills', for-profit networks that produce and sell large amounts of low-quality or fake papers. Bio: Elisabeth Bik, PhD is a Dutch-American microbiologist who has worked for 15 years at Stanford University and 2 years in industry. Since 2019, she is a science integrity volunteer and consultant who scans the biomedical literature for images or other data of concern. She has found over 8,000 scientific papers, and her work resulted in over 1,200 retractions and another 1,000 corrections. For her work in science communication and exposing research misconduct, she received the 2021 John Maddox Prize.

Comments
  • The Dark Side of Science: Misconduct in Biomedical Research. Lecture by dr. Elisabeth Bik. 3 years ago
    The Dark Side of Science: Misconduct in Biomedical Research. Lecture by dr. Elisabeth Bik.
    Опубликовано: 3 years ago
    11142
  • How do biology researchers assess the credibility of research? - Iain Hrynaszkiewicz 1 year ago
    How do biology researchers assess the credibility of research? - Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
    Опубликовано: 1 year ago
    183
  • What’s wrong with clinical trial registries? - Leeza Osipenko 8 months ago
    What’s wrong with clinical trial registries? - Leeza Osipenko
    Опубликовано: 8 months ago
    449
  • Using null fields to quantify overall bias in the scientific literature - Matthew Sigurdson 11 months ago
    Using null fields to quantify overall bias in the scientific literature - Matthew Sigurdson
    Опубликовано: 11 months ago
    142
  • «Жить надо сегодня». Олег Тиньков и Майкл Калви о взлете нового финтех-стартапа Plata 8 hours ago
    «Жить надо сегодня». Олег Тиньков и Майкл Калви о взлете нового финтех-стартапа Plata
    Опубликовано: 8 hours ago
    78151
  • Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to improve reproducibility - Mariska Leeflang 4 months ago
    Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to improve reproducibility - Mariska Leeflang
    Опубликовано: 4 months ago
    97
  • PhD and postdoc training outcomes at EMBL - Rachel Coulthard-Graf 7 months ago
    PhD and postdoc training outcomes at EMBL - Rachel Coulthard-Graf
    Опубликовано: 7 months ago
    98
  • Jumpers-Up and Droppers-Down in Research Productivity? No Chance – Marek Kwiek 13 days ago
    Jumpers-Up and Droppers-Down in Research Productivity? No Chance – Marek Kwiek
    Опубликовано: 13 days ago
    39
  • Lose 100 LBs, Win $250,000! 5 days ago
    Lose 100 LBs, Win $250,000!
    Опубликовано: 5 days ago
    129200050
  • Bounded research ethicality - Lina Koppel 1 year ago
    Bounded research ethicality - Lina Koppel
    Опубликовано: 1 year ago
    88

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5